Well, that's certainly one approach, but xsd:unions are supported by
some tools, but not others, and they are a valid construct.
It is hard to argue that they shouldn't be used just because a given
tool doesn't support them.
I will look into the other options in any case.
Many thanks
Nathan
Nathan Sowatskey - Technical Leader, NMTG CTO Engineering -
+34-638-083-675, +34-91-201-2139 - AIM NathanCisco - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 7 Jul 2006, at 18:07, Anne Thomas Manes wrote:
On the other hand, is there a better way entirely? XMLBeans perhaps?
Yes. Don't use <xsd:union>.
Try <xsd:choice> instead.
Or maybe a substitution group.
Anne
On 7/7/06, Nathan Sowatskey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi
I guess we all know that xsd:union types are not supported for Axis
1.x, so we need to write our own de/serialisers.
Does anyone have any useful guidance on how to do that please?
On the other hand, is there a better way entirely? XMLBeans perhaps?
Many thanks
Nathan
Nathan Sowatskey - Technical Leader, NMTG CTO Engineering -
+34-638-083-675, +34-91-201-2139 - AIM NathanCisco -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
