so lets go for that , AFAIK we only need to change DependencyManager to
support that.
Eran Chinthaka wrote:
>Rodrigo Ruiz wrote:
>
>
>>Mmm, yes of course. But I guess you are talking about a mandatory
>>interface, like Remote. I am talking about an optional one, like
>>LifeCycle. For example:
>>
>>public interface ContextAware {
>> void setOperationContext(OperationContext ctx);
>>}
>>
>>In this case, only those services interested in having this data will
>>need to implement it. The rest can work just like now.
>>
>>Such an interface would make reflection/introspection unnecessary, and
>>the relationship with Axis2 more explicit.
>>
>>
>
>Hmm, now it makes sense to me :). I can remember there was a discussion
>on the same topic some time back, on this list, but can not remember
>what happened to it.
>
>What do the others think about this? Can I implement this?
>
>For the time being, lets leave the dependency injection for the existing
>code to work and implement this as well.
>
>Comments ?
>
>-- Chinthaka
>
>
>
--
Thanks,
Deepal
................................................................
~Future is Open~
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
