+1 from me. On 7/14/06, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
so lets go for that , AFAIK we only need to change DependencyManager to support that.Eran Chinthaka wrote: >Rodrigo Ruiz wrote: > > >>Mmm, yes of course. But I guess you are talking about a mandatory >>interface, like Remote. I am talking about an optional one, like >>LifeCycle. For example: >> >>public interface ContextAware { >> void setOperationContext(OperationContext ctx); >>} >> >>In this case, only those services interested in having this data will >>need to implement it. The rest can work just like now. >> >>Such an interface would make reflection/introspection unnecessary, and >>the relationship with Axis2 more explicit. >> >> > >Hmm, now it makes sense to me :). I can remember there was a discussion >on the same topic some time back, on this list, but can not remember >what happened to it. > >What do the others think about this? Can I implement this? > >For the time being, lets leave the dependency injection for the existing >code to work and implement this as well. > >Comments ? > >-- Chinthaka > > > -- Thanks, Deepal ................................................................ ~Future is Open~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas : http://www.wso2.net (Oxygen for Web Service Developers) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
