It's not a debate between POX and Axis (specifically) -- it's between
POX and SOAP/WS-*. And the REST debate is one between
service-orientation versus resource-orientation. Note that REST
doesn't preclude the use of SOAP and WS-*. The significant distinction
is in the operations exposed by the service. In unRESTful systems, the
service exposes a customized set of operations, e.g., getQuote,
getCustomerByID, calculateSalesTax, etc. In a RESTful system, the
service exposes a generic interface, e.g., Get, Put, Post, Delete.
Passing in a method name with a set of parameters is unRESTful.

Here's a nice writeup on REST:
http://www.xfront.com/REST-Web-Services.html

This article summarizes some of the debate about SOAP being too "enterprisey":
http://blogs.zdnet.com/service-oriented/?p=614

Also, you can Google "SOAP enterprisey" and find more.

Anne

On 8/31/06, Michael Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Anne,

I would like to know more about the debate between AXIS and POX supporters
and would be grateful if you would point me in the right direction (without
bringing the debate into this forum).

You said: "There is a growing backlash against the complexity of SOAP and
WS-*, and in response, people are looking for a simpler, more native-Web
approach to services. And that's POX -- Plain Old XML over HTTP. HTTP is a
very powerful and scalable application protocol. It supports clean
separation of header and application payload. It provides a means to support
self-describing messages (using MIME types). It supports security (HTTPS)
and stateful sessions (cookies). Many argue that the SOAP envelope and all
the SOAP Headers are just a lot of extra clutter. And for many applications,
that's true. POX is absolutely adequate."

Thanks!

Regards,

Michael




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to