Hi Josh,
If you're using unwrapped you shouldn't need to map this at all. If
you're using wrapped handling you'd just have a "marker" class with an
empty mapping:
<mapping class="updateResponse" name="updateResponse"/>
You can see an example of the unwrapped handling for this at
http://www.sosnoski.com/jibx-wiki/space/axis2-jibx/example (with the
WSDL and code at
http://www.sosnoski.com/jibx-wiki/space/axis2-jibx/example/library-service).
- Dennis
Dennis M. Sosnoski
SOA and Web Services in Java
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117
Josh wrote:
All,
I am having difficulting dealing with an existing WSDL which declares
a "void" response message. I have the following in my wsdl:
<element name="updateResponse">
<complexType/>
</element>
<wsdl:message name="updateResponse">
<wsdl:part element="impl:updateResponse" name="parameters"/>
</wsdl:message>
Because this is really a void return, how would I map this using JiBX?
Regards,
Joshua
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
