On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 11:29 -0400, Jake Goulding wrote:
> Thanks Michele!
> 
> That did help, but left me with 2.5 questions:
> 
> 1/ Why does the client need to spawn a web server at all?

Because it uses two separate channels.

> 1b/ Is it possible to disable this server completely?

Yes, disable the addressing module and use a single channel (i.e.
synchronous communication).

> 2/ If I create a ConfigurationContext, how do I set what I need to set, 
> and then how do I use it?

See here (for example)
http://wso2.org/library/87
http://wso2.org/library/585
http://wso2.org/library/290
http://wso2.org/library/209

Michele

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Michele Mazzucco wrote:
> > http://wso2.org/library/165
> >
> > HTH,
> > Michele
> >
> > On Mon, 2007-04-23 at 10:28 -0400, Jake Goulding wrote:
> >   
> >> Hey all:
> >>
> >> I use axis to connect to a Windows Sharepoint server. Recently, an 
> >> installation of our code started returning these errors:
> >>
> >> java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect; nested 
> >> exception is:
> >> org.apache.axis2.AxisFault: Address already in use: connect; nested 
> >> exception is:
> >> java.net.BindException: Address already in use: connect
> >>
> >> What I don't get is how this is possible. Pure client code should not 
> >> need to bind to any particular address/port at all. The code generated 
> >> from the WSDL shouldn't even have the server-side code generated. Thanks 
> >> in advance for any hints / fixes!
> >>
> >> -Jake
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >>
> >>     
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >   
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to