Michele, from prev experience it takes us at least 2-3 RC's and then final. There is no way we can get thru all that in a couple of days. do you? :)
-- dims On 7/1/07, Michele Mazzucco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dims, I disagree with what Eran says, which is "we have a deadline, so probably not all bugs will be fixed for the next release". I think people would be much more happy to wait 1 or 2 weeks more to have a more reliable release than having an unstable one now. Simply lowering bug priorities from blockers to critical (or other) doesn't mean the tool is bug free (this is what I understand from previous emails). And, of course, adding new features will probably mean adding new bugs as well. Michele On 1 Jul 2007, at 13:09, Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Michele, > > Why do you think that? Blockers are Blockers for the release. If the > blockers are not addressed, there will not be a release. Isn't that > why i sent this email about voting for your bug and adding comments to > make stuff blockers? > > What am i missing here? > > thanks, > dims > > On 7/1/07, Michele Mazzucco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Eran, >> >> your point is "let's add new, cool features", my point is "let's >> build something reliable". I think if you want to use a tool in a >> production environment the second point is much more important. >> >> >> Michele >> >> On 1 Jul 2007, at 04:53, Eran Chinthaka wrote: >> >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> > Hash: SHA1 >> > >> > Michele Mazzucco wrote: >> >> Dims, >> >> >> >> what about postponing the 1.3 release and fixing (at least) all >> the >> >> blockers? ;) >> > >> > Michele, >> > >> > I do not see a point in that. If we have a deadline then >> everyone is >> > encouraged to work. If just postpone then we will lose the >> > momentum. And >> > also of there are significant improvements over the last release >> > then it >> > is the best to think about a release. I think what we need is to >> set >> > realistic goals with deadlines which is what Dims had done. >> > >> > Chinthaka >> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) >> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org >> > >> > iD8DBQFGhyUrjON2uBzUhh8RAoEhAKCV4AYGl18ApVdUizqc1hyOEae/mACdFAy5 >> > NT3qeHhTTHvqsM0uzVuo5Xo= >> > =QTbK >> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
