Here it is. The relevant operation is getConcept.
ent.wsdl
Description: Binary data
Thanks, Jason On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
Hi,It is not the QName different in those two cases, it is just the prefix.It does not matter what the prefix is. What you need to do is too compare the response with the WSDL. Since you are new the Web service, one thing you can do is send us the WSDL, then we can tell what the problem is. Deepal Jason Wells wrote:Hi, I'm new to the Axis2/SOAP world and I'm using Tomcat 6/Axis2 1.4.1. I'm running into a problem. I've written a simple Java POJO service and generated ADB client code from its generated WSDL. One of its operations returns another simple POJO, in this case having two String members. When I call it from a SOAP tool I'm using, I get this response back: <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" <soapenv:Body> <ns:getClass1Response xmlns:ns="http://service.enterprise.semantica <http://service.enterprise.semantica/>"> <ns:return type="semantica.enterprise.model.Concept"> <ax21:name>Blah<./ax21:name> <ax21:guid>Blah2.</ax21:guid> </ns:return> </ns:getClass1Response> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope>And when I call that operation from my ADB client, I get the followingexception: "org.apache.axis2.AxisFault:org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement guid"But I have another operation that is essentially identical, in that ithas the same signature and returns a different POJO having two Strings, just like the first one. I get this back: <soapenv:Envelope xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/"> <soapenv:Body> <ns:getZogResponse xmlns:ns="http://service.enterprise.semantica <http://service.enterprise.semantica/>"> <ns:return type="semantica.enterprise.service.Zog"> <ax23:one>One.</ax23:one> <ax23:theOther>The Other.</ax23:theOther> </ns:return> </ns:getZogResponse> </soapenv:Body> </soapenv:Envelope> This one works in the ADB client. The only significant difference I see is that the QNames for the return classes is different (ax21 vs.ax23). The two classes are basically identical, except that the broken code uses a class from a different package than the service class, and the working class is in the same package. But why would this be a problem?Thanks, Jason-- Thank you! http://blogs.deepal.org http://deepal.org
