The class returned by the first operation, the one that threw the
exception (below), was a subclass of an abstract class. The exception
went away once I changed that. I'm glad it works now, but why would
this be a problem?
On Jan 6, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Deepal Jayasinghe wrote:
Hi,
It is not the QName different in those two cases, it is just the
prefix.
It does not matter what the prefix is. What you need to do is too
compare the response with the WSDL. Since you are new the Web service,
one thing you can do is send us the WSDL, then we can tell what the
problem is.
Deepal
Jason Wells wrote:
Hi, I'm new to the Axis2/SOAP world and I'm using Tomcat 6/Axis2
1.4.1. I'm running into a problem. I've written a simple Java POJO
service and generated ADB client code from its generated WSDL. One of
its operations returns another simple POJO, in this case having two
String members. When I call it from a SOAP tool I'm using, I get this
response back:
<soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
<soapenv:Body>
<ns:getClass1Response xmlns:ns="http://service.enterprise.semantica
<http://service.enterprise.semantica/>">
<ns:return type="semantica.enterprise.model.Concept">
<ax21:name>Blah<./ax21:name>
<ax21:guid>Blah2.</ax21:guid>
</ns:return>
</ns:getClass1Response>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
And when I call that operation from my ADB client, I get the
following
exception:
"org.apache.axis2.AxisFault:
org.apache.axis2.databinding.ADBException: Unexpected subelement
guid"
But I have another operation that is essentially identical, in that
it
has the same signature and returns a different POJO having two
Strings, just like the first one. I get this back:
<soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";>
<soapenv:Body>
<ns:getZogResponse xmlns:ns="http://service.enterprise.semantica
<http://service.enterprise.semantica/>">
<ns:return type="semantica.enterprise.service.Zog">
<ax23:one>One.</ax23:one>
<ax23:theOther>The Other.</ax23:theOther>
</ns:return>
</ns:getZogResponse>
</soapenv:Body>
</soapenv:Envelope>
This one works in the ADB client. The only significant difference I
see is that the QNames for the return classes is different (ax21 vs.
ax23). The two classes are basically identical, except that the
broken
code uses a class from a different package than the service class,
and
the working class is in the same package. But why would this be a
problem?
Thanks,
Jason
--
Thank you!
http://blogs.deepal.org
http://deepal.org
