Hi David, Yes, that should be configured with the log4j.properties (the one in axis.jar, or any other one that happens to override it). If you are not seeing a ton of debug in the output on the server side, then it is probably set to INFO. :)
If it's DEBUG, you really don't have to try to "include any time" for it in your testing, as every call will be slowed down dramatically by all of the extra output. In any case, I agree that the product feels fairly slow even with just INFO mode. --- Jess Sightler Exim Technologies On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 17:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Jesse, > > I've noticed the speed claims as well, but my experience tells me > otherwise. I'm not aware of any benchmarks. > > I haven't modified any of the logging defaults, so I believe it's set to > INFO now. You are referring to logging output and the log4j.properties > in the axis.jar, are you not? > > My test did not include any time for console output, it was just the > time to put the call together, execute it, and get the response back. By > the way, I'm doing RPC style calls. > > I'd welcome any other suggestions for things to check. Or pointers to > tests that others have done. > > Thanks, > -David > > > > > Hi David, > > I've noticed that the Axis website claims speed gains over ApacheSOAP, > but I've never really seen any evidence to back this up. I'd be really > curious to know what kinds of benchmarks have been done comparing the > performance of the two products. > > I will ask, though, whether or not debugging output could have been an > issue in your scenario. I don't know exactly how you are using the > product, but I know that initially we had the output set to DEBUG mode > for our entire application (which included Axis) and this cost us a lot > in terms of performance. Moving Axis to the INFO level sped things up > dramatically. > > Anyway, just a few random thoughts. > -- > ======================================= > Jess Sightler > Programmer > Exim Technologies > 131 Falls Street > Greenville SC 29601 > Phone: 864-679-4651 > > > > On Fri, 2002-11-01 at 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > I took a web service I created with Apache SOAP 2.3.1 and converted it > > to work with Axis 1.0. They are pretty much the same actually. I got > > curious about the performance, so I made a few simple timed tests, and > > I'm a little surprised about the results. A SOAP call took 818 > > milliseconds on average, and Axis took 3415 milliseconds. In other > > words, a call via Axis was roughly 4 times longer. Ouch! I'm wondering > > if anyone else has migrated services from the old SOAP to Axis, only > to > > find them much slower? > > > > - David > ======================================= > > > > >
