SAML is about specifying the XML format of your authorization decision outcome (authorization assertion). It also defines a protocol how to request the assertion. SAML doesn't describe how the decision should be made. XACML is attempting to standardize how such decision rules should be specified. So it is completely solving an orthogonal problem.

I'm not sure how important to standardize decision making rules because there is NO "inter-operability" requirement for that. There is NO need to communicating how I made my decision to my business partners. The value of XACML is "portability" of my decision criteria across multiple vendor products. However, "portability" has never been a goal for any XML standard. It is arguable how important XACML will be.

Best regards,
ricky

At 06:38 PM 3/16/2003 +0530, Nisha Menon wrote:
hi,

i am trying to create an authorization module for web services that is independant of the application and to authorize i've chosen to use WS-Security and SAML.
would anyone on this list be familiar with similar implementation? or have any references for the same?
also, how does XACML compare to SAML?


thank you,

nisha

**************************Disclaimer************************************

Information contained in this E-MAIL being proprietary to Wipro Limited is
'privileged' and 'confidential' and intended for use only by the individual
 or entity to which it is addressed. You are notified that any use, copying
or dissemination of the information contained in the E-MAIL in any manner
whatsoever is strictly prohibited.

***************************************************************************



Reply via email to