That's not right. I'm using an existing WSDL and when I run WSDL2Java the
generated <>BindingStub doesn't use the correct namespaces.
See: http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21824
Oliver
Steve Maring
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
o.com> Kopie:
Thema: Re: Axis doc/lit - impossible?
08.10.2003 14:20
Bitte antworten
an axis-user
DOCUMENT/LITERAL certainly does work! Mostly anyway.
I recently submitted a patch (bug <a
href="http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23664
">23664</a>) that fixed a deserialization problem on
the client side with operations not containing any in
params.
Here is a contrived example project doing
DOCUMENT/LITERAL with Castor plugged in to handle the
type mapping of params and return types. <a
href="http://www.maring.org/CustomTypeMapper.zip";>CustomTypeMapper.zip</a>
(8MB)
The project starts with data types defined as XSDs, a
WSDL, a functional SOAPBindingImpl, and a functional
TestCase. Out of it comes a deployable war. There
are also contained therein a couple of handy
stylesheets that I wrote to convert the generated
deploy.wsdd into server-config.wsdd and
client-config.wsdd.
I had no interest in the Java2WSDL process since I
wanted my Castor generated data types to reside in a
seperate namespace.
Cheers.
Steve Maring
--- Oliver Wulff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Maybe, it's not mentioned if it's a bug in
> document/literal for Axis 1.1
> rc2. Probably, it didn't work at all (also for
> rpc/encoded) in rc2 but it
> has been fixed only for rpc/encoded in Axis 1.1.
> I sent my problem some weeks ago and got the
> information that this seems to
> be a bug and I should raise a request to bugzilla.
>
> Oliver
>
>
******************************************************************
> Oliver Wulff
> Z�rich Versicherungs-Gesellschaft
> IA4, CoC Middleware
> Postfach, 8085 Z�rich
> Telefon: +41- 1 628 58 07
> Fax: +41 - 1 623 58 07
> E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> Davanum Srinivas
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Kopie:
> 08.10.2003 13:05
> Thema: Re: Antwort: RE: Axis doc/lit - impossible?
> Bitte antworten
>
> an axis-user
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Oliver,
>
> is this a duplicate of
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20054?
>
> -- dims
>
> --- Oliver Wulff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > I had the same problem with document/literal and
> raised the bug 21824.
> > Hope, it will be fixed soon, because I have to
> manually fix the
> namespaces
> > in the generated code.
> >
> > Oliver
> >
> >
>
******************************************************************
> > Oliver Wulff
> > Z�rich Versicherungs-Gesellschaft
> > IA4, CoC Middleware
> > Postfach, 8085 Z�rich
> > Telefon: +41- 1 628 58 07
> > Fax: +41 - 1 623 58 07
> > E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Davanum Srinivas
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> An:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> Kopie:
> > 08.10.2003 12:13
> Thema: RE: Axis doc/lit
> - impossible?
> > Bitte antworten
> > an axis-user
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > java2wsdl works too (maybe a bit flaky)...In Axis
> terms, you need to use
> > the "wrapped" mode. See
> >
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AxisProjectPages/Wrapped.
> The
> > WHOLE confusion is
> > because have a flag "-y" in java2wsdl that can
> take DOCUMENT/WRAPPED/RPC.
> > DOCUMENT here means that
> > the the deployer/programmer knows exactly what to
> do in wsdd and Axis
> > should not wrap or unwrap
> > the method parameters. WRAPPED is used when you
> need Axis to do doc/lit
> and
> > you don't want to muck
> > around with wsdd. See
> >
>
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?AxisProjectPages/Wrapped
> for
> > pointers to previous discussions etc.
> >
> > -- dims
> >
> > --- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Dims,
> > >
> > > Perhaps the team's assessment of the desired use
> cases for doc/literal
> > was
> > > a bit too limited. java2wsdl should be capable
> of generating a
> > doc/literal
> > > WSDL definition from a Java class.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Anne
> > >
> > > At 02:48 AM 10/8/2003 -0700, you wrote:
> > > >I repeat myself...
> > > >
> > > >The Best Use case for doc/lit that Axis 1.1
> supports is when you start
> > > >with an existing WSDL and
> > > >run WSDL2Java on it and use the generated code.
> If you have problems
> > with
> > > >this, open up a bug
> > > >report with sample code.
> > > >
> > > >Thanks,
> > > >dims
> > > >
> > > >--- Cory Wilkerson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > > > I concur. Doc/literal support was an
> afterthought when Axis was
> put
> > > > together.
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Mike Perham
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:02 PM
> > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Subject: RE: Axis doc/lit - impossible?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > That's been our finding also. Axis supports
> rpc/encoded very well.
> > > > > Anything else is just an exercise in
> frustration. We wound up
> > writing
> > > > > our own doc/lit SOAP stack because Axis just
> didn't work and
> Sysinet
> > was
> > > > > too expensive and proprietary.
> > > > >
> > > > > mike
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Dennis Sosnoski
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:28 PM
> > > > > To: axis-user
> > > > > Subject: Axis doc/lit - impossible?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Mitch Gitman has an article up on JavaWorld
> talking about Web
> service
> > > > > styles
> > > > > (
>
http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2003/jw-1003-wsstyles.html?
> > ).
> > > > > In the second page he covers several
> attempted approaches to
> > > > > implementing a doc/lit service using Axis
> (none of which work
> > properly)
> > > > > and comes to the conclusion that "while Axis
> purports
=== message truncated ===
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
http://shopping.yahoo.com
