Oliver, Marked this bug as a duplicate (http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20054). There's a possible patch with 20054 that may fix the problem.
-- dims --- Oliver Wulff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Mike, > > run WSDL2Java for the WSDL published at > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21824 > > You'll notice that the namespaces are missing. It generates: > _return.value = (com.xmlbus.berechtigung.xsd.OrgEinheit_T)_output.get(new > > javax.xml.namespace.QName("", "return")); > instead of > _return.value = (com.xmlbus.berechtigung.xsd.OrgEinheit_T) > _output.get(new > javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://xmlbus.com/berechtigung";, "return")); > > Oliver > > ****************************************************************** > Oliver Wulff > Z�rich Versicherungs-Gesellschaft > IA4, CoC Middleware > Postfach, 8085 Z�rich > Telefon: +41- 1 628 58 07 > Fax: +41 - 1 623 58 07 > E-Mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > "PARLEY,THUNDER > (HP-MountainView An: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ,ex1)" Kopie: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thema: RE: Axis doc/lit - > impossible? > > 09.10.2003 01:38 > Bitte antworten > an axis-user > > > > > > > Hi List, > > I was able to generate perfectly working client classes with WSDL2Java from > an SAP wsdl file which specifies a soap binding style of 'document' and > soap > body use="literal". > > So is the issue that doc/lit support on the server side is 'impossible'? > > Just Curious, > > Thunder > > PS - If anyone wants, I can send them the WSDL. > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cory Wilkerson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 12:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Axis doc/lit - impossible? > > > I concur. Doc/literal support was an afterthought when Axis was put > together. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Perham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:02 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Axis doc/lit - impossible? > > > That's been our finding also. Axis supports rpc/encoded very well. > Anything else is just an exercise in frustration. We wound up writing > our own doc/lit SOAP stack because Axis just didn't work and Sysinet was > too expensive and proprietary. > > mike > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dennis Sosnoski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 1:28 PM > To: axis-user > Subject: Axis doc/lit - impossible? > > > Mitch Gitman has an article up on JavaWorld talking about Web service > styles > (http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-10-2003/jw-1003-wsstyles.html?). > In the second page he covers several attempted approaches to > implementing a doc/lit service using Axis (none of which work properly) > and comes to the conclusion that "while Axis purports to support > document/literal, it actually doesn't." > > Any comments? I've played around with doc/lit using Axis myself and ran > into problems, but assumed I could find a work-around with enough effort > (probably by avoiding WSDL2Java and Java2WSDL, and supplying my own WSDL > for the service - at which point Axis isn't really adding a lot of > value). Mitch says that Axis flat out doesn't support doc/lit, though he > appears to only be working with the W2J/J2W tools. > > - Dennis > > > ===== Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/
