-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tom Schindl schrieb:
| Scott Penrose schrieb:
| |
[...]

| What I'm trying to say is that if you don't insert you buisness logic
| directly into the Provider-code but instead but it in some other module
| you are free to use it in any provider. In TomKit a haven't even to do
| that (but you should because Caching is much more simple then) and your
| provider can also be a simple PerlResponseHandler, that's one of the
| great things about TomKit that you can use any PerlModule e.g.
| downloaded from CPAN to be you Provider without writting any wrapper for
| it.
|
| One more thing to add. Maybe when I have time I'll write a wrapper which
| can be used to directly run AxKit-Processor in TomKit but I really had

Should have mean AxKit-Provider ;-) but may Processors as well.

| no time to do so far. You could simply add a feature-request in the
| bugtracking system.
|
| |
| | I know this is a bit of a vicious circle, since to get it released  you
| | probably need more work etc. so please tell me if there is some  way I
| | can help in the short term get it more public and in the long  term help
| | make it real.
| |
| | Thanks
| |
| | Scott
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCunKokVPeOFLgZFIRAtxpAKCfLl3qNDduRQoFKz2wEy9OoGRgagCdGw9C
B8vTb0INqFc6y/gbDHq764k=
=1PFZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to