Tom Schindl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well I'm not sure we should go on discussing here the issues with TomKit > which is until now not the offical successor of AxKit or moreover AxKit2 > and maybe will never be. Maybe I should get up a mailling list > discussing TomKit or what ever name it will get. What's the opinion of > the other guys hanging around here?
Just my opinion as a lurker: I'm glad to see any progress in .*Kit. I wouldn't divide the new TomKit experimental way from AxKit. AxKit historically suffers from unbundled efforts. Effort should go into getting more feedback for your work. For me it seems a simple "OK, go for it" from the core developers with cvs commit rights and a branch for your work would be the most valuable thing at this moment. With some rules to keep all this compliant to the Apache.org rules, I can't think of a bad thing that could happen to AxKit with your experiments. It seems there are some people out there with interests in XML with Apache2. Talking at the same place where the XML+Apache1 experienced people talk, might be a way to get more spin. GreetinX Steffen -- Steffen Schwigon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dresden Perl Mongers <http://dresden-pm.org/>
