On Friday, Nov 22, 2002, at 17:30 Europe/London, Tod Harter wrote:
I never really honestly thought much of the SAX approach. In THEORY its nice,XSP.pm is simpler than you think. The code's not that hard, people are just afraid of it because it has to maintain a bit of state in the stack, and has to special-case a few tags to do the right thing.
but once I sat down and considered the logic required to do it, it got scary
fast! It would have to be a pretty elaborate stack-based state-machine.
Turning XSP.pm into an XSLT engine would be a backward step here. It's much harder to do some of the heuristic stuff we do in XSP.pm in XSLT. Stick with the mantra "if it ain't broke...". Yes, there's a small bug in namespace output, but I'm willing to bet it's easy to fix.
Matt.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
