Hi, Thanks for all the replys.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2003 at 05:24:52PM +0100, Robin Berjon wrote: > S Woodside wrote: > >xsltproc or sabcmd depending on which xslt processor you're using will > >do what you want but I don't think either does pipelines. But why > >bother? The caching system works great. Your system will only process > >files once, and serve the cached copy thereafter. Plus, you never have > >the spend the cycles on files that never get used. > Yes. I do like AxKit for many reasons - mainly because ive gotten a whole site up in a short space of time while knowing little about the technologies to begin with. Ive got the cache turned on but it still seems to take more cpu (and resident memory) than a similar setup i have on another Ultra 5 with Apache just serving plain html. So im just a bit worried that its gonna fall over when it goes live - and thus am lookin around for other possible startegies if this happens. This is maybe a new topic but could anyone tell me if this is comparable to what they see on their servers (or maybe this stuff aint comparable but here goes...) On my development box i have axkit servin xml When i request a cached page i get 2 httpd process going from 0.00% to anything from 0.10 - 0.18% If i keep making new requests, this will spiral upwards to around 0.60% - 0.80% With vanilla apache and html this will stick around 0.05% and drop back to zero quicker. Maybe this is nothing to worry about - but i have quite a busy server and im of the worrying type :-) Also, im no expert at configuring apache or AxKit so maybe there is stuff i could to to alleviate this if its a problem but i would appreciate if someone could let me know if they see similar top results and its still good for them etc... Thanks again Martin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
