On Fri, 14 Feb 2003, Martin Buchan wrote: > Yes. I do like AxKit for many reasons - mainly because ive gotten a > whole site up in a short space of time while knowing little about > the technologies to begin with.
That's good to hear. > Ive got the cache turned on but it still seems to take more cpu (and > resident memory) than a similar setup i have on another Ultra 5 with > Apache just serving plain html. Yes, I think there's not a lot you can do about that (though some - see below). You're running the perl interpreter after all. > On my development box i have axkit servin xml > When i request a cached page i get 2 httpd process going from > 0.00% to anything from 0.10 - 0.18% > If i keep making new requests, this will spiral upwards to around > 0.60% - 0.80% > > With vanilla apache and html this will stick around 0.05% and drop > back to zero quicker. > > Maybe this is nothing to worry about - but i have quite a busy > server and im of the worrying type :-) > > Also, im no expert at configuring apache or AxKit so maybe there is > stuff i could to to alleviate this if its a problem but i would > appreciate if someone could let me know if they see similar top > results and its still good for them etc... OK, I've put a page on the wiki about this: http://axkit.org/wiki/view/AxKit/PerformanceTips Hopefully it will be some help. -- <!-- Matt --> <:->get a SMart net</:-> Spam trap - do not mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
