A variety of reasons, including: 1) XPathScript is more "perly", which is good for my coworkers (I'm the only one who knows any XSLT) 2) Performance: XPathScript says it executes faster than XSLT (doesn't it?) and looking at the architecture of the two, that is what I would expect.
Brad --- S Woodside <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Why not use XSLT (especially since you already know > it)? > > simon > > On Monday, February 24, 2003, at 05:38 PM, Bradley > Marshall wrote: > > > So I'm just starting out with XPathScript. I have > > quite a bit of XSLT experience, and I've noticed a > > large difference in style between the two > approaches. > > Mty question is basically whether or not I'm > > approaching the following problem in the right way > for > > XPathScript. > > > -- > www.simonwoodside.com -- 99% Devil, 1% Angel > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - forms, calculators, tips, more http://taxes.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
