On 19 Aug 2005, at 13:22, Aaron Steager wrote:
Is PassiveTeX the tool I should use or is the something else that is better suited?
Most people prefer HTMLDoc because the input is HTML 3.2, which they can generate very easily. However you definitely have more control of the output via XSL-FO (and PassiveTeX).
If it is does anyone have some simple xsp fo xsl files I could look at? I'm not asking for anyone to do my work but a few simple files I could look through would be greatly appreciated.
Try google for xsl-fo examples. There are hundreds on the 'net. w3schools.org might be a good place to start.
Matt. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
