On 8 September 2011 17:20, Jason Smith <jason.sm...@canonical.com> wrote: > On 09/08/2011 11:59 AM, Javier Jardón wrote: >> >> On 7 September 2011 08:44, Devil505<devil505li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm porting Ayatana to Frugalware and it's not always easy, IMHO >>> these ubuntu patches (especially the ones for glib2 and gtk2/3) should >>> be accepted by upstream, some efforts must be done in that way if >>> we want to see Unity and indicators available on non-ubuntu based >>> distributions. >> >> AFAIK, No patches are propossed upstream >> > I know for certain all the BAMF patches (when they were valid) were proposed > upstream, rejected, and then replaced by very similar but slightly different > (though functionally the same) patches.
Do you have a bug report number? I do not get any result if I search for BAMF or "Application Matching Framework" in bugzilla -- Javier Jardón Cabezas _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-dev Post to : ayatana-dev@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp