Forwarding another that didn't seem to make it. On Monday, June 07, 2010 11:44:59 am Martin Gräßlin wrote: > Am Sonntag 06 Juni 2010, 21:39:40 schrieb Ted Gould: > > On Sat, 2010-06-05 at 23:31 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > So I think it's worth continuing the conversation. I'm personally > > > quite concerned that we are about to have a permanent split between > > > GTK/Gnome and Qt/KDE on this topic that will make future work on > > > desktop consistency much more difficult. > > > > Why couldn't Qt support themes that specify the window title as well? > > There's already work on keeping the theming across toolkits, it seems > > like this just extends it. I don't see this as creating a larger gap as > > before to get consistency you need to make a GTK, Qt, KWin, Compiz and > > Metacity theme (they pull from each other, but you need to check them > > all) and now you just have to make a larger GTK and Qt theme. > > Do you really think that is a valid use case or argument for CSD? How many > projects do you know of which need both a GTK and QStyle? I know of > Mandriva and that's it. And Mandriva is kind of invalid for Ubuntu ;-) > (Also as they do use a distinct window decoration) Sorry but this sounds > to me like another argument how CSD will fix problems which do not even > exist. In fact I do not know of any other Open Source project except KDE > which actually implements a QStyle.
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

