> > Dear Ms. Jones, > > With respect, I must urge caution about talk of "perfection" in > natural languages, whether for Greek, Latin, Aymara or anything else. > To a professional linguist, all languages are potentially > interesting, and none is more "perfect" than another. > Ken: Admitiendo que no sea admisible la relaci�n "m�s perfecto que" entre dos lenguajes dados, no crees que de todos modos existe alg�n criterio de clasificaci�n/jerarquizaci�n?. Por ejemplo, en una discusi�n de t� y David, en esta misma lista, ustedes concordaban que el aymara (gramatica) era "alucinante". De esto entiendo que el aymara es, por lo menos, "m�s alucinante que" algunas otras lenguas, pues no todas las lenguas pueden ser "alucinantes". Si todas las lenguas fueran alucinantes, ser�a irrelevante calificar por tal a una de ellas. Un abrazo. Jorge
- [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Omar Beas
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Laura Jones
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Jorge P. Arpasi
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Laura Jones
- RE: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Alex Condori
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Ken Beesley
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Jorge P. Arpasi
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Laura Jones
- RE: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Alex Condori
- [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Omar Beas
- [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Omar Beas
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture aymar ccopacatty
- RE: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture David Sanchez
- RE: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture David Sanchez
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Laura Jones
- RE: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Ken Beesley
- Re: [aymara] Aymara and Western Culture Ken Beesley
