"incógnito" as in "unknown", "oculto" as in "unknown" or "hidden" depending
on the case.

A sábado, 9 de mar de 2019, 17:23, Cheri Mello <[email protected]>
escreveu:

> Sam,
>
> Those that grew up in the Azores or are more familiar with the history
> would have to chime in on how a child of an "adulterer" would be viewed
> over there.
>
> Cheri
> Cheri Mello
> Listowner, Azores-Gen
> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente,
> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 9, 2019 at 8:56 AM 'Sam (Camas, WA)' via Azores Genealogy <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Interesting how they recorded this stuff.  Cheri, or anyone, do you know
>> if there was a stigma attached to the child or to the parents for that
>> matter?  I found it somewhat surprising that in the record I found it
>> stated that the husband had been “away for over 300 days”   Certainly
>> leaves no doubt that the baby wasn’t his.  So many scenarios in my mind for
>> when/if the husband returns.  What happens to the baby?  Mom keeps it, it
>> goes in the roda, dad keeps it.  I did find one record where the mom wasn’t
>> listed, only the dad.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sam (Mazatlán, MX)
>>
>>
>>
>> *From: *Cheri Mello <[email protected]>
>> *Sent: *Friday, March 8, 2019 12:15 PM
>> *To: *Azores Genealogy <[email protected]>
>> *Subject: *Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Avo incognito, Avo occulto; difference?
>>
>>
>>
>> The "adulterer" term isn't used as in today's definition. Basically, one
>> (or both) parties were married. I have one record in my family where
>> Francisco was single, Maria was married to So-and-So. Francisco and Maria
>> had a baby. Francisco was listed as the adulterer. By today's definition,
>> Maria was the adultress and Francisco having relations with a married woman
>> isn't a nice thing, but I can't think of a "proper" word for that in the
>> English language. I know lots of name-calling terms for that, but I don't
>> think there's a proper word for a single man who has a relationship with a
>> married woman.
>>
>> Cheri Mello
>> Listowner, Azores-Gen
>> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente,
>> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 11:09 AM JesseAndDeborah Mendonca <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> While they both translate to hidden, as in refuse to name; oculto
>> definition includes not known.   Could that be the difference?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 8, 2019 at 9:31 AM Leonor Bertoni <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Sam,
>>
>> I have wondered about all these terms as well. I have found that when the
>> priest says "adulterina" he usually also mentions a father. Someone once
>> told me that it meant that the baby was conceived before marriage or the
>> couple were not married at all.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 12:12, 'Sam (Camas, WA)' via Azores Genealogy <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Happy Friday morning everyone;
>>
>>
>>
>> As I’ve been extracting baptisms/births, I have noticed that the same
>> priest during the same time period will sometimes use Avo incognito and
>> other times use Avo occult and on occasion simply state that it is
>> “natural  de” and the mother’s name with no mention at all of the father.
>> On only one occasion, so far, has it been stated that the mother is
>> “adulterina” (may not have spelled that correctly)
>>
>>
>>
>> Does anyone know why it is recorded in these various ways.  I understand
>> that if you are single you are not an “adulterine” but; other than that,
>> what are the differences?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for educating me,.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sam (Mazatlán, MX)
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> [image:
>> https://ipmcdn.avast.com/images/icons/icon-envelope-tick-round-orange-animated-no-repeat-v1.gif]
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=icon>
>>
>> Virus-free. www.avast.com
>> <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient&utm_term=link>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Azores Genealogy" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Azores Genealogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/azores.

Reply via email to