Thank you very much John! I think I read this years ago but it
Was very good to read again and I will file in a place for safe keeping!

Susan Vargas Murphy 

>> On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:22 AM, 'John Raposo' via Azores Genealogy 
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Here is the work on expostos by Eloise Cadinha. Some years ago she shared it 
> with me and she also gave me permission to share it. It has been published on 
> this list before. I know because I get e-mails from people who have found it 
> and either want more information, want to express their surprise at how awful 
> this situation was, and to express their appreciation for Eloise's hard work 
> and erudition on this subject.
> 
> You will not find very much on this subject. Until recent times it was taboo 
> just as slavery in the Azores is and as Jewish roots used to be. Times 
> change, and what might have been an uncomfortable discussion 50 years ago is 
> now open for discussion. I am waiting for some serious research on slavery in 
> the Azores.
> 
> What follows is the work done by Eloise for whom I have much admiration and 
> to whom I owe much for her sharing erudition.:
> 
> Most of us as we research our ancestors will find an exposto or two.  It is 
> indeed miraculous that they were able to survive to adulthood, to marry and 
> to have children. 
> Expostos - a translation : A very sad situation.
> Eloise Cadinha
> (The following is my poor translation/distillation of part of an article 
> written by Henrique Bras (1884-) in Boletim de Instituto Histórico da Ilha 
> Terceira, 1947.)
> In the last three centuries there is a long list of filhos da igreja 
> (children of the church), also known at times in baptismal records in the 
> parish registers of Terceira, as children of unknown fathers and mothers 
> (filho(a) de pais incógnitos), who were often baptized with the most noble or 
> notable or the very rich people of Terceira serving as godparents.  In more 
> recent times the number of children secretly abandoned at the rodas (wheels) 
> had greatly increased, despite the many recently born innocents who died when 
> abandoned, and the few for whom the fear of discovery, still did not keep 
> them from being strangled before seeing the light of day.  Providing support 
> for these children who survived became one of the most difficult problems for 
> the various city halls on the island, demanding a new special tax...which the 
> people agreed was needed but not without grumbling and finding fault with the 
> new tax. 
> 
> On April 29, 1800, the Conde de Almada, Captain General of the Azores in 
> Angra, informed an official of the Royal Court that in the last ten years the 
> Cathedral had annually registered the baptism of an average of 97 expostos 
> and also registered an average of 83 who had died!  And this number was only 
> of those engeitados (abandoned ones) who had arrived at the Cathedral to be 
> baptized, those that had been left in the Casa da Roda, and this number was 
> only for Angra. 
> The city council continued without resources to provide for these children 
> and thought about creating a lottery for that purpose. 
> It needs to be said: with a population of about 10 to 12 thousand people, 
> there were yearly on an average 97 newborn abandoned children of unknown 
> parents, legally registered and of which 83 of these died -- naturally by 
> affectionate handling, sheltered and well wrapped care.
> [Translator’s note: the author mentions Carlota, a weaver of Angels, from the 
> famous  novel by Eça de Queiroz. I asked a cousin if he knew of this novel, O 
> Crime do Padre Amaro, and he said  that he had read it long ago, and it was 
> about a woman who got rid of unwanted infants. She killed them by wrapping 
> them up and drowning them in the river.  She was referred to as something 
> like the "maker of angels," (tecedeira de anjos) the idea being that she was 
> creating angels by killing the babies.]
> On October 20, 1782, the vicar of the diocese of Angra, Dr. João Vieira de 
> Bettencourt, commissioned the rector of the Cathedral, Pedro da Cãmara 
> Merens, to organize a separate book to register the baptisms and deaths of 
> these abandoned children.
> In the year of 1783 there were registered 120 baptisms and 81 deaths of 
> expostos:
> In 1784, 94 baptisms, 73 deaths;
> In 1785, 97 baptisms, 86 deaths;
> In 1786, 94 baptisms, 105 deaths;
> In 1787, 86 baptisms, 100 deaths;
> In 1788, 100 baptisms;
> In 1789, 95 baptisms.
> There were no deaths recorded for the years 1788 and 1789 but resumed again 
> the following year.  One can see that in 10 years the births and deaths of 
> the foundlings was astounding. 
> Painful emotions squeeze the soul when one looks through the pages, tiny 
> tragedies sown through this separate book of the Cathedral.  The records 
> indicate the names of the amas (wet-nurses) nominated by city hall for each 
> exposto.  They were single women, 'loose' women, married women and widows. 
> In the Casa da Roda...in the city of Angra, there was the rodeiro (the man in 
> charge of the wheel) who had at least one assistant, in order to rescue 
> quickly any of the new guests secretly left at the door in the silence of the 
> night. The newborn was left there, shivering in the cold until the door 
> providentially was opened.  It was rare to announce a visit to the Roda, for 
> fear of the discovery of the mother’s identity which was of great importance 
> to the municipality, in order to avoid the expense of providing a wet-nurse 
> for the child -- and so that justice also intervened. 
> Sometimes a little one was carried there by a caring person saying he had 
> found the abandoned child in some hidden place. Thus on 16 September 1782, 
> Francisco da Silveira, gravedigger of São Pedro, Biscoitos, arrived at the 
> Roda with a bundle.  It was a baby girl who had been placed at the door of 
> the home of the sexton of the church. She was soon baptized and given the 
> name Delfina.  This man delivered this baby to the Roda knowing that she 
> would not cost the finder any money for finding the child.  He also presumed 
> that she would be cared for, but this child died and her death was not 
> recorded in the church register. 
> The Casa da Roda was next to the residence of the pai dos engeitados (the 
> father, i.e. guardian, of the abandoned ones) who was a councilman in the 
> senate of the city hall, and who had the municipal duty to care for the 
> expostos, and also the responsibility for the place elected by the 
> municipality for the receiving of these abandoned ones. 
> This councilman had a most distressful mission.  The city did not have money 
> for the number of abandoned children, growing larger each year, and for the 
> prompt payment of the wet-nurses, and for this and for other reasons, the 
> milk from these women was not sufficient to fulfill the need for these 
> babies. 
> The expostos arrived at the Casa da Roda and there they waited two to fifteen 
> days for a wet-nurse.  The priest noted the baptism of the children in the 
> register: baptized in the Casa da Roda, with the name of Francisco, found 
> very young and had not been given a wet-nurse and he lasted a few days; Jose, 
> baptized in the Casa da Roda, died without a wet-nurse; Manuel after being 
> baptized died in the Casa da Roda.
> One particularly unhappy exposto to whom the godfather, Cosme de Mascarenhas, 
> the bell ringer of the Cathedral (this man throughout the years became 
> godfather to nearly all the newly baptized expostos), gave the name Abraão 
> (Abraham), and none of the wet-nurses wished to care for him the priest wrote 
> in the record of baptism (20 March 1783, p19, book number 1).  The bell 
> ringer had discovered that the newly born child was Jewish and had given him 
> a suitable name.  These wet-nurses ... they  refused to nurse this newborn 
> heretic.  Sixteen days passed, with Abraham suffering and in pain, until he 
> finally died. 
>  These death records note the approximate age of the child.  These 
> unfortunate children said farewell to their miserable existence between three 
> days and three months.  Few of the expostos reached the age of 1 year and 
> very few beyond one year. 
>  The author does not know if the position of the city official in charge of 
> the wet-nurses was lucrative -- but it was truly an industry.  The wet-nurses 
> naturally came from the poorest sections of the city and outlying areas, but 
> it was the city that provided most of the wet-nurses.  At times it was not 
> enough and the city had to go to the peasants in villages such as Sao 
> Bartolomeu and Santa Barbara.  It was an industry that had wet-nurses who 
> could kill off these charges with hideous rapidity.  The wet-nurses received 
> three expostos each year, one following the other after the death of the one 
> before. 
>  [The author listed three wet-nurses and the infants received.  One of them 
> in 1785 had 5 expostos.  Inacio, April 5; Marilia, May 17; Violante, July 22; 
> Antonio, Aug 20; Mateus, Sept 21.]
>  This separate book of the expostos from the Cathedral made it easy to study 
> them. In previous times it was extremely difficult to learn about them 
> because there were no statistics.  But whoever turns the first pages of this 
> register of the Cathedral rarely turns two pages.
>  There were many reasons why children were abandoned by their mothers and 
> fathers. Some of the reasons being: an illegitimate child,  extreme poverty 
> and too many mouths to feed, perhaps the death of the father, or just simply 
> an unwanted child. 
>  One can research the smaller villages and not find a single exposto in the 
> baptism records..  At least this has been my experience.  In the larger towns 
> and villages many expostos are found, certainly many abandoned from the 
> smaller villages. In years of famine more children were left as foundlings.  
> These abandoned children were left at churches, convents, and at the doors of 
> many homes. 
>  Many children were left at convents.  In many of the convents through Europe 
> there was what was called the Roda, or the Wheel which in antuality was in 
> the form of a cylinder.  It was a wheel that could spin from the outside of 
> the building to the inside.  Goods or other articles for the convent were 
> left on the wheel, and usually there was some kind of a bell to let the nuns 
> know that something had been left on the wheel.  In time, desperate mothers 
> and fathers left their children on the wheel. 
>  In reading some of the exposto baptism records in certain villages, the 
> priest notes to which mother in the village the child was given.  The child 
> had to have a nursing mother, and usually one can check back and find that 
> nursing mother in the record.  And sometimes the priest noted where the child 
> had been found. 
>  When an exposto (male) married he already had a surname or perhaps was given 
> one at the time of the marriage. I wish I knew more about this.  As for 
> surnames of the exposto,  they run the gamut from Azevedo to Xavier.  As for 
> the exposta (female) I don’t think she was ever given a surname, or at least 
> I can’t remember seeing one on her marriage record or on the baptism records 
> of her children. 
>  Many parents when abandoning their children believed it would only be for a 
> certain period of time.  When the child was left at the convent or at church 
> or at the doorstep some clues were left so that the parents could later claim 
> their child.  Notes sometimes were left with the name of the child, or 
> perhaps a certain type of clothing, some colored ribbons or an embroidered 
> blanket.  These were the clues and apparently the church did keep a record of 
> these identifying clues. 
>  The following comes from a baptism record on Sao Miguel in 1861.  A copy of 
> the record was given to me by a fellow researcher. It touched her heart as 
> she read it; it also touched mine. 
>  A baby girl had been left at the home of a proprietor. The lady of the house 
> with her servant took the child to the public roda of the Vila.  The child 
> was number 312. 
>  The baby was dressed in a cotton white shirt, a rose colored dress, with two 
> ribbons, one white and the other yellow. 
>  In all the baptisms of expostos that I have  seen as I researched I never 
> saw anything such as this.   I have often wondered what happened to this 
> baby.  There was no notation in the margin. The baby must have come from a 
> family of means. 
>  Eloise Cadinha
>  ______________________________
> The abandoned child brought forth a new statute, that of the Exposto and, 
> with the foundling emerged the Roda or foundling hospital.  In the 16th 
> century the protection of the foundlings was handed over to the municipal 
> councils and then to the charity hospitals as soon as they were founded.
> Eventually, the children were abandoned at the "Roda dos Expostos” (next to 
> convents) which reached their peak of operation at the end of the 18th 
> century.
> "The foundling turn box was a revolving mechanism situated vertically at the 
> main doors of the convents where the children are place and abandoned.  Roda 
> was the name which was commonly given to the institution which took the 
> foundling into custody.  D. Maria I recognized it officially in a 
> proclamation on 24 May 1783.  She decided that in all cities and villages in 
> the reign there should be a "Casa de Roda," situated in a discreet location, 
> so those who gave up the children could do it without risk of being 
> recognized."  (Source: Translated by L. Polsky from Atlântico Revista de 
> Temas Culturais No.20 Winter 1989).
> In practical terms, I think that the convents were therefore set up to 
> receive these expostos better than smaller churches. The women having 
> unwanted babies in the other parishes would arrange for someone to take the 
> newborn and put them on the "roda" which is a wheel that spins from outside 
> to inside a convent. The wheel spins between a wall so you spin the wheel and 
> what is outside the convent is now inside it and thus these babies enter the 
> convent. My description is based on what those records say and what I've 
> heard from others. So I might be a bit off in accuracy, but that's the 
> general thing.
> I just found a better example of the Roda. The revolving door of an Hotel in 
> which the floor would also go with it. The differences is that the revolving 
> door is divided in FOUR parts and the Roda only in TWO and about 80 cms high.
> Another interesting thing I now recall:.
> The mothers or fathers when abandoning a children did have their reasons. 
> Unwanted pregnancy, an illegitimate child, lack of resources to feed the 
> child and so on. (How many Portuguese soldiers and sailor died during the 
> Portuguese age of discoveries leaving their families without resources of any 
> kind? Portugal at that time had somewhere between 2 and 3 million inhabitants 
> and at one given time half of the known world was under the Portuguese flag. 
> It has been a tremendous effort and so no wonder the importance of the 
> abandoned children and the Kingdom’s protection of them. The strain went to 
> the point that a saying stated that ALL Portuguese homes had something in 
> common: either a Sailor, a Widow or a Priest !)
>  Some abandoned their children believing that the abandonment was temporary, 
> until conditions improved, or for whatever reason they thought they could 
> come and claim the child sometime later. So it was a custom to leave 
> something to identify the child, a medal, a ribbon and sometimes a note 
> saying the first name of the child.
>  The Institutions receiving the Expostos  kept those identifying materials to 
> identified the children and to give them back to its family. Most of them 
> never came for them so, the Institutions kept the identifying material.
>  The Santa Casa da Misericordia de Lisboa is one of those Institutions and, 
> by far, has the biggest known collection of those identifying objects and 
> messages, some centuries old, lovingly guarded in books and boxes, a pungent 
> collection of souvenirs of unwanted children, or wanted children but 
> abandoned for lack of whatever reason, that well deserves being seen.         
>         (Luis,C. L. Porto / Portugal)
>  
> 
>  
>  
> 
> On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 8:37:09 PM EDT, Cheri Mello 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> We know historically that the rodas were to be used for offerings to the 
> church and that the abandoned babies were left there.
> 
> What about today? Do they use the rodas still for offerings? What does a 
> woman or young girl do if she cannot provide for her baby today?
> Cheri Mello
> Listowner, Azores-Gen
> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, 
> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:53 PM Rosemarie Capodicci <[email protected]> wrote:
> Well, I just looked for it and didn't find it so I guess it never was there! 
> I could have sworn that it was on the site but I guess not. 
> 
> Rosemarie
> [email protected]
> Researching Sao Jorge, Terceira, Graciosa, Faial and Pico, Azores,
> Isola delle Femmine, Sant' Elia, Sicily
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:03 AM Cheri Mello <[email protected]> wrote:
> Rosemarie, where? I can't find it. Where did you see it? 
> 
> I've emailed Eloise asking her permission to have the article posted on the 
> Azores GenWeb (unless it's already there - as I said, I can't find it.)
> Cheri Mello
> Listowner, Azores-Gen
> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, 
> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 7:58 AM Rosemarie Capodicci <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think that Eloise's article is on the AzoresGenWeb site here: 
> http://www.worldgenweb.org/azrwgw/ go and check it out. 
>  
> Rosemarie
> [email protected]
> Researching Sao Jorge, Terceira, Graciosa, Faial and Pico, Azores,
> Isola delle Femmine, Sant' Elia, Sicily
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:10 PM JesseAndDeborah Mendonca 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Linda,
> 
> I found your cousin Eloise’s work cited as a source on a search, but never 
> found the actual articles she wrote.  If you have copies, may we have access 
> to them?   Will Eloise give us permission?
> 
> Cheri will know if it’s acceptable or not to use her article on this site.   
> I can help make them into a link if you need help.  My email is below.  
> 
> Thank you!
> 
> Debbie
> jessdebmendonca at gmail. Com
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:01 PM Linda Jardin <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
> Eloise Cadinha is my cousin.  I have spoken with her regarding this subject 
> as we have an exposta whom was left at the Matriz Sao Sebastiao.  She has 
> written articles regarding the abandonment of babies. Some of these may still 
> be available on the internet.  I do have copies if anyone is interested.  I 
> also have direct contact with Eloise.  She is a lovely lady and sharp as a 
> tack!
> 
>  
> 
> From: 'John Raposo' via Azores Genealogy <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Wednesday, October 2, 2019 2:13 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Expostos left at the roda of the churches
> 
>  
> 
> The towns and cities had Foundling homes, usually convents, but not all 
> churches in the cities and towns were foundling homes. In the villages, as 
> can be seen in baptismal records, the foundlings were left either at 
> somebody's door or in a place where they would likely be found. Eloise 
> Cadinha studied this situation extensively and I have her notes.
> 
>  
> 
> John Miranda Raposo
> 
>  
> 
> On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 3:35:49 PM EDT, Cheri Mello 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> I seem to remember Joao Ventura, the archivist, stating that many babies were 
> given up at the Matriz churches more so than the smaller parish church. The 
> information is on the Azores GenWeb (I'm pretty sure). I'll look when I get 
> home.
> 
> Cheri Mello
> Listowner, Azores-Gen
> Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, 
> Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:32 PM Maria Sousa <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> 
> I know this question comes up often and I am familiar with the "roda" and the 
> "oxpostos".  My question is, did every church have the "roda" system or was 
> it just certain churches?   Maybe even each frequesia had a "matrix" church 
> which had  the roda?  Does anyone happen to know?
> 
>  
> 
> It was very heartbreaking looking for my ancestor in Sao Sebastiao Church in 
> Ponta Delegada and the amount of expostos that I read was astounding.  So 
> much so that each exposto was given a number.   My ancestor happened to be a 
> number in the 600s.  I noticed the number on her marriage certificate and 
> then was able to match the same number to her birth certificate.   Still a 
> deadend for me, but so heartbreaking to think of the hundreds of people who 
> were going to this church to hand over a child.  I can't image what was going 
> on in the 1860 to 1890 in that area, that so many were just giving up their 
> children.  
> 
>  
> 
> Would love to hear your thoughts.
> 
>  
> 
> Maria Sousa
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAE_yQQVb-5ceuWZAwFr8Cty7bf8p%2B8FWAicc64aWcoANXJ2z9A%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_FL4cXTqmhqg4FJ6ZzXgVSq04dLBtaZZBKCwPWpDgN4yA%40mail.gmail.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/375168660.1799035.1570050766683%40mail.yahoo.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/0585C5DE2150594390CFB84053F8E0E50154F729%40ORD2MBX03C.mex05.mlsrvr.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAJ7050sAAPM52A5Nvxdh_WooF12tj6QW8TbWzGupEdaB5qeOLA%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7mAkC7uyDBsvTtXmQGevT2%2BVZ3AvTjgbz%3Dt3q16g25ivQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_EwZ%2BvSuX7LBpABfFRah1C-douJsDK07N4%2BN5ogDRHywg%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7nCaWuLdzmfmRa7WShLyYNM315mDqGU9qULvgB3FPEtFQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_Fr8e-apqi0Dt5zdriGMdWG%2Bc-SDWp%3Drn4xqB1rxvKuZQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Azores Genealogy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/1178758625.2759315.1570368170315%40mail.yahoo.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Azores Genealogy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/6DE253F4-0041-4FFC-8CD8-86E5E7300541%40aol.com.

Reply via email to