Thank you to all! This has been most helpful and fascinating. Maria Sousa
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 10:59 AM 'John Raposo' via Azores Genealogy < azores@googlegroups.com> wrote: > I also found this in the archives: > > Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Naming of Expostos > <https://www.mail-archive.com/azores@googlegroups.com/msg27459.html> > > Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Naming of Expostos > > <https://www.mail-archive.com/azores@googlegroups.com/msg27459.html> > > John Miranda Raposo > > On Sunday, October 6, 2019, 10:32:34 AM EDT, 'Susan Murphy' via Azores > Genealogy <azores@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > Thank you very much John! I think I read this years ago but it > Was very good to read again and I will file in a place for safe keeping! > > Susan Vargas Murphy > > On Oct 6, 2019, at 6:22 AM, 'John Raposo' via Azores Genealogy < > azores@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > > Here is the work on expostos by Eloise Cadinha. Some years ago she shared > it with me and she also gave me permission to share it. It has been > published on this list before. I know because I get e-mails from people who > have found it and either want more information, want to express their > surprise at how awful this situation was, and to express their appreciation > for Eloise's hard work and erudition on this subject. > > You will not find very much on this subject. Until recent times it was > taboo just as slavery in the Azores is and as Jewish roots used to be. > Times change, and what might have been an uncomfortable discussion 50 years > ago is now open for discussion. I am waiting for some serious research on > slavery in the Azores. > > What follows is the work done by Eloise for whom I have much admiration > and to whom I owe much for her sharing erudition.: > > Most of us as we research our ancestors will find an *exposto* or two. > It is indeed miraculous that they were able to survive to adulthood, to > marry and to have children. > > *Expostos* - a translation : A very sad situation. > > Eloise Cadinha > > (The following is my poor translation/distillation of part of an article > written by Henrique Bras (1884-) in *Boletim de Instituto Histórico da > Ilha Terceira*, 1947.) > > In the last three centuries there is a long list of *filhos da igreja* > (children of the church), also known at times in baptismal records in the > parish registers of Terceira, as children of unknown fathers and mothers > (*filho(a) > de pais incógnitos*), who were often baptized with the most noble or > notable or the very rich people of Terceira serving as godparents. In more > recent times the number of children secretly abandoned at the *rodas* > (wheels) had greatly increased, despite the many recently born innocents > who died when abandoned, and the few for whom the fear of discovery, still > did not keep them from being strangled before seeing the light of day. > Providing support for these children who survived became one of the most > difficult problems for the various city halls on the island, demanding a > new special tax...which the people agreed was needed but not without > grumbling and finding fault with the new tax. > > On April 29, 1800, the Conde de Almada, Captain General of the Azores in > Angra, informed an official of the Royal Court that in the last ten years > the Cathedral had annually registered the baptism of an average of 97 > *expostos* and also registered an average of 83 who had died! And this > number was only of those *engeitados* (abandoned ones) who had arrived at > the Cathedral to be baptized, those that had been left in the *Casa da > Roda*, and this number was only for Angra. > > The city council continued without resources to provide for these children > and thought about creating a lottery for that purpose. > > It needs to be said: with a population of about 10 to 12 thousand people, > there were yearly on an average 97 newborn abandoned children of unknown > parents, legally registered and of which 83 of these died -- naturally by > affectionate handling, sheltered and well wrapped care. > > [Translator’s note: the author mentions Carlota, a weaver of Angels, from > the famous novel by Eça de Queiroz. I asked a cousin if he knew of this > novel, *O Crime do Padre Amaro, *and he said that he had read it long > ago, and it was about a woman who got rid of unwanted infants. She killed > them by wrapping them up and drowning them in the river. She was referred > to as something like the "maker of angels," *(tecedeira de anjos) *the > idea being that she was creating angels by killing the babies.] > > On October 20, 1782, the vicar of the diocese of Angra, Dr. João Vieira de > Bettencourt, commissioned the rector of the Cathedral, Pedro da Cãmara > Merens, to organize a separate book to register the baptisms and deaths of > these abandoned children. > > In the year of 1783 there were registered 120 baptisms and 81 deaths of > *expostos*: > > In 1784, 94 baptisms, 73 deaths; > In 1785, 97 baptisms, 86 deaths; > In 1786, 94 baptisms, 105 deaths; > In 1787, 86 baptisms, 100 deaths; > In 1788, 100 baptisms; > In 1789, 95 baptisms. > > There were no deaths recorded for the years 1788 and 1789 but resumed > again the following year. One can see that in 10 years the births and > deaths of the foundlings was astounding. > > Painful emotions squeeze the soul when one looks through the pages, tiny > tragedies sown through this separate book of the Cathedral. The records > indicate the names of the *amas* (wet-nurses) nominated by city hall for > each *exposto*. They were single women, 'loose' women, married women and > widows. > > In the *Casa da Roda*...in the city of Angra, there was the *rodeiro* > (the man in charge of the wheel) who had at least one assistant, in order > to rescue quickly any of the new guests secretly left at the door in the > silence of the night. The newborn was left there, shivering in the cold > until the door providentially was opened. It was rare to announce a visit > to the *Roda*, for fear of the discovery of the mother’s identity which > was of great importance to the municipality, in order to avoid the expense > of providing a wet-nurse for the child -- and so that justice also > intervened. > > Sometimes a little one was carried there by a caring person saying he had > found the abandoned child in some hidden place. Thus on 16 September 1782, > Francisco da Silveira, gravedigger of São Pedro, Biscoitos, arrived at the > *Roda* with a bundle. It was a baby girl who had been placed at the door > of the home of the sexton of the church. She was soon baptized and given > the name Delfina. This man delivered this baby to the *Roda* knowing > that she would not cost the finder any money for finding the child. He > also presumed that she would be cared for, but this child died and her > death was not recorded in the church register. > > The *Casa da Roda* was next to the residence of the *pai dos* *engeitados* > (the father, i.e. guardian, of the abandoned ones) who was a councilman in > the senate of the city hall, and who had the municipal duty to care for the > *expostos*, and also the responsibility for the place elected by the > municipality for the receiving of these abandoned ones. > > This councilman had a most distressful mission. The city did not have > money for the number of abandoned children, growing larger each year, and > for the prompt payment of the wet-nurses, and for this and for other > reasons, the milk from these women was not sufficient to fulfill the need > for these babies. > > The *expostos* arrived at the Casa da *Roda* and there they waited two to > fifteen days for a wet-nurse. The priest noted the baptism of the children > in the register: baptized in the *Casa da Roda*, with the name of > Francisco, found very young and had not been given a wet-nurse and he > lasted a few days; Jose, baptized in the *Casa da Roda*, died without a > wet-nurse; Manuel after being > baptized died in the *Casa da Roda*. > > One particularly unhappy *exposto* to whom the godfather, Cosme de > Mascarenhas, the bell ringer of the Cathedral (this man throughout the > years became godfather to nearly all the newly baptized *expostos*), gave > the name Abraão (Abraham), and none of the wet-nurses wished to care for > him the priest wrote in the record of baptism (20 March 1783, p19, book > number 1). The bell ringer had discovered that the newly born child was > Jewish and had given him a suitable name. These wet-nurses ... they > refused to nurse this newborn heretic. Sixteen days passed, with Abraham > suffering and in pain, until he finally died. > > These death records note the approximate age of the child. These > unfortunate children said farewell to their miserable existence between > three days and three months. Few of the *expostos* reached the age of 1 > year and very few beyond one year. > > The author does not know if the position of the city official in charge > of the wet-nurses was lucrative -- but it was truly an industry. The > wet-nurses naturally came from the poorest sections of the city and > outlying areas, but it was the city that provided most of the wet-nurses. > At times it was not enough and the city had to go to the peasants in > villages such as Sao Bartolomeu and Santa Barbara. It was an industry that > had wet-nurses who could kill off these charges with hideous rapidity. The > wet-nurses received three *expostos* each year, one following the other > after the death of the one before. > > [The author listed three wet-nurses and the infants received. One of > them in 1785 had 5 expostos. Inacio, April 5; Marilia, May 17; Violante, > July 22; Antonio, Aug 20; Mateus, Sept 21.] > > This separate book of the *expostos* from the Cathedral made it easy to > study them. In previous times it was extremely difficult to learn about > them because there were no statistics. But whoever turns the first pages > of this register of the Cathedral rarely turns two pages. > > There were many reasons why children were abandoned by their mothers and > fathers. Some of the reasons being: an illegitimate child, extreme poverty > and too many mouths to feed, perhaps the death of the father, or just > simply an unwanted child. > > One can research the smaller villages and not find a single *exposto* in > the baptism records.. At least this has been my experience. In the larger > towns and villages many *expostos* are found, certainly many abandoned > from the smaller villages. In years of famine more children were left as > foundlings. These abandoned children were left at churches, convents, and > at the doors of many homes. > > Many children were left at convents. In many of the convents through > Europe there was what was called the *Roda*, or the Wheel which in > antuality was in the form of a cylinder. It was a wheel that could spin > from the outside of the building to the inside. Goods or other articles > for the convent were left on the wheel, and usually there was some kind of > a bell to let the nuns know that something had been left on the wheel. In > time, desperate mothers and fathers left their children on the wheel. > > In reading some of the *exposto* baptism records in certain villages, > the priest notes to which mother in the village the child was given. The > child had to have a nursing mother, and usually one can check back and find > that nursing mother in the record. And sometimes the priest noted where > the child had been found. > > When an *exposto* (male) married he already had a surname or perhaps was > given one at the time of the marriage. I wish I knew more about this. As > for surnames of the *exposto*, they run the gamut from Azevedo to > Xavier. As for the *exposta* (female) I don’t think she was ever given a > surname, or at least I can’t remember seeing one on her marriage record or > on the baptism records of her children. > > Many parents when abandoning their children believed it would only be for > a certain period of time. When the child was left at the convent or at > church or at the doorstep some clues were left so that the parents could > later claim their child. Notes sometimes were left with the name of the > child, or perhaps a certain type of clothing, some colored ribbons or an > embroidered blanket. These were the clues and apparently the church did > keep a record of these identifying clues. > > The following comes from a baptism record on Sao Miguel in 1861. A copy > of the record was given to me by a fellow researcher. It touched her heart > as she read it; it also touched mine. > > A baby girl had been left at the home of a proprietor. The lady of the > house with her servant took the child to the public *roda* of the Vila. > The child was number 312. > > The baby was dressed in a cotton white shirt, a rose colored dress, with > two ribbons, one white and the other yellow. > > In all the baptisms of *expostos* that I have seen as I researched I > never saw anything such as this. I have often wondered what happened to > this baby. There was no notation in the margin. The baby must have come > from a family of means. > > Eloise Cadinha > > ______________________________ > The abandoned child brought forth a new statute, that of the *Exposto* > and, with the foundling emerged the *Roda* or foundling hospital. In the > 16th century the protection of the foundlings was handed over to the > municipal councils and then to the charity hospitals as soon as they were > founded. > > Eventually, the children were abandoned at the "Roda dos Expostos” (next > to convents) which reached their peak of operation at the end of the 18th > century. > > "The foundling turn box was a revolving mechanism situated vertically at > the main doors of the convents where the children are place and abandoned. > *Roda* was the name which was commonly given to the institution which > took the foundling into custody. D. Maria I recognized it officially in a > proclamation on 24 May 1783. She decided that in all cities and villages > in the reign there should be a "Casa de Roda," situated in a discreet > location, so those who gave up the children could do it without risk of > being recognized." (Source: Translated by L. Polsky from *Atlântico > Revista de Temas Culturais* No.20 Winter 1989). > > In practical terms, I think that the convents were therefore set up to > receive these *expostos* better than smaller churches. The women having > unwanted babies in the other parishes would arrange for someone to take the > newborn and put them on the "*roda*" which is a wheel that spins from > outside to inside a convent. The wheel spins between a wall so you spin the > wheel and what is outside the convent is now inside it and thus these > babies enter the convent. My description is based on what those records say > and what I've heard from others. So I might be a bit off in accuracy, but > that's the general thing. > > I just found a better example of the *Roda*. The revolving door of an > Hotel in which the floor would also go with it. The differences is that the > revolving door is divided in FOUR parts and the Roda only in TWO and about > 80 cms high. > > Another interesting thing I now recall:. > > The mothers or fathers when abandoning a children did have their reasons. > Unwanted pregnancy, an illegitimate child, lack of resources to feed the > child and so on. (How many Portuguese soldiers and sailor died during the > Portuguese age of discoveries leaving their families without resources of > any kind? Portugal at that time had somewhere between 2 and 3 million > inhabitants and at one given time half of the known world was under the > Portuguese flag. It has been a tremendous effort and so no wonder the > importance of the abandoned children and the Kingdom’s protection of them. > The strain went to the point that a saying stated that ALL Portuguese homes > had something in common: either a Sailor, a Widow or a Priest !) > > Some abandoned their children believing that the abandonment was > temporary, until conditions improved, or for whatever reason they thought > they could come and claim the child sometime later. So it was a custom to > leave something to identify the child, a medal, a ribbon and sometimes a > note saying the first name of the child. > > The Institutions receiving the *Expostos* kept those identifying > materials to identified the children and to give them back to its family. > Most of them never came for them so, the Institutions kept the identifying > material. > > The *Santa Casa da Misericordia de Lisboa* is one of those Institutions > and, by far, has the biggest known collection of those identifying objects > and messages, some centuries old, lovingly guarded in books and boxes, a > pungent collection of *souvenirs* of unwanted children, or wanted > children but abandoned for lack of whatever reason, that well deserves > being seen. (Luis,C. L. Porto / Portugal) > > > > > > > On Saturday, October 5, 2019, 8:37:09 PM EDT, Cheri Mello < > gfsche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We know historically that the rodas were to be used for offerings to the > church and that the abandoned babies were left there. > > What about today? Do they use the rodas still for offerings? What does a > woman or young girl do if she cannot provide for her baby today? > Cheri Mello > Listowner, Azores-Gen > Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, > Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 3:53 PM Rosemarie Capodicci <rcap...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Well, I just looked for it and didn't find it so I guess it never was > there! I could have sworn that it was on the site but I guess not. > > Rosemarie > rcap...@gmail.com > Researching Sao Jorge, Terceira, Graciosa, Faial and Pico, Azores, > Isola delle Femmine, Sant' Elia, Sicily > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:03 AM Cheri Mello <gfsche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Rosemarie, where? I can't find it. Where did you see it? > > I've emailed Eloise asking her permission to have the article posted on > the Azores GenWeb (unless it's already there - as I said, I can't find it.) > Cheri Mello > Listowner, Azores-Gen > Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, > Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada > > > On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 7:58 AM Rosemarie Capodicci <rcap...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I think that Eloise's article is on the AzoresGenWeb site here: > http://www.worldgenweb.org/azrwgw/ go and check it out. > > Rosemarie > rcap...@gmail.com > Researching Sao Jorge, Terceira, Graciosa, Faial and Pico, Azores, > Isola delle Femmine, Sant' Elia, Sicily > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 10:10 PM JesseAndDeborah Mendonca < > jessdebmendo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Linda, > > I found your cousin Eloise’s work cited as a source on a search, but never > found the actual articles she wrote. If you have copies, may we have > access to them? Will Eloise give us permission? > > Cheri will know if it’s acceptable or not to use her article on this site. > I can help make them into a link if you need help. My email is below. > > Thank you! > > Debbie > jessdebmendonca at gmail. Com > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:01 PM Linda Jardin <ljar...@legacymechanical.com> > wrote: > > Eloise Cadinha is my cousin. I have spoken with her regarding this > subject as we have an exposta whom was left at the Matriz Sao Sebastiao. > She has written articles regarding the abandonment of babies. Some of these > may still be available on the internet. I do have copies if anyone is > interested. I also have direct contact with Eloise. She is a lovely lady > and sharp as a tack! > > > > *From:* 'John Raposo' via Azores Genealogy <azores@googlegroups.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 2, 2019 2:13 PM > *To:* azores@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [AZORES-Genealogy] Expostos left at the roda of the > churches > > > > The towns and cities had Foundling homes, usually convents, but not all > churches in the cities and towns were foundling homes. In the villages, as > can be seen in baptismal records, the foundlings were left either at > somebody's door or in a place where they would likely be found. Eloise > Cadinha studied this situation extensively and I have her notes. > > > > John Miranda Raposo > > > > On Wednesday, October 2, 2019, 3:35:49 PM EDT, Cheri Mello < > gfsche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > I seem to remember Joao Ventura, the archivist, stating that many babies > were given up at the Matriz churches more so than the smaller parish > church. The information is on the Azores GenWeb (I'm pretty sure). I'll > look when I get home. > > Cheri Mello > Listowner, Azores-Gen > Researching: São Miguel island: Vila Franca, Ponta Garca, Ribeira Quente, > Ribeira das Tainhas, Achada > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 12:32 PM Maria Sousa <lelaalvesso...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > I know this question comes up often and I am familiar with the "roda" and > the "oxpostos". My question is, did every church have the "roda" system or > was it just certain churches? Maybe even each frequesia had a "matrix" > church which had the roda? Does anyone happen to know? > > > > It was very heartbreaking looking for my ancestor in Sao Sebastiao Church > in Ponta Delegada and the amount of expostos that I read was astounding. > So much so that each exposto was given a number. My ancestor happened to > be a number in the 600s. I noticed the number on her marriage certificate > and then was able to match the same number to her birth certificate. > Still a deadend for me, but so heartbreaking to think of the hundreds of > people who were going to this church to hand over a child. I can't image > what was going on in the 1860 to 1890 in that area, that so many were just > giving up their children. > > > > Would love to hear your thoughts. > > > > Maria Sousa > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAE_yQQVb-5ceuWZAwFr8Cty7bf8p%2B8FWAicc64aWcoANXJ2z9A%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAE_yQQVb-5ceuWZAwFr8Cty7bf8p%2B8FWAicc64aWcoANXJ2z9A%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_FL4cXTqmhqg4FJ6ZzXgVSq04dLBtaZZBKCwPWpDgN4yA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_FL4cXTqmhqg4FJ6ZzXgVSq04dLBtaZZBKCwPWpDgN4yA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/375168660.1799035.1570050766683%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/375168660.1799035.1570050766683%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/0585C5DE2150594390CFB84053F8E0E50154F729%40ORD2MBX03C.mex05.mlsrvr.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/0585C5DE2150594390CFB84053F8E0E50154F729%40ORD2MBX03C.mex05.mlsrvr.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAJ7050sAAPM52A5Nvxdh_WooF12tj6QW8TbWzGupEdaB5qeOLA%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAJ7050sAAPM52A5Nvxdh_WooF12tj6QW8TbWzGupEdaB5qeOLA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7mAkC7uyDBsvTtXmQGevT2%2BVZ3AvTjgbz%3Dt3q16g25ivQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7mAkC7uyDBsvTtXmQGevT2%2BVZ3AvTjgbz%3Dt3q16g25ivQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_EwZ%2BvSuX7LBpABfFRah1C-douJsDK07N4%2BN5ogDRHywg%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_EwZ%2BvSuX7LBpABfFRah1C-douJsDK07N4%2BN5ogDRHywg%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7nCaWuLdzmfmRa7WShLyYNM315mDqGU9qULvgB3FPEtFQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKnzR7nCaWuLdzmfmRa7WShLyYNM315mDqGU9qULvgB3FPEtFQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_Fr8e-apqi0Dt5zdriGMdWG%2Bc-SDWp%3Drn4xqB1rxvKuZQ%40mail.gmail.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAKUUw_Fr8e-apqi0Dt5zdriGMdWG%2Bc-SDWp%3Drn4xqB1rxvKuZQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/1178758625.2759315.1570368170315%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/1178758625.2759315.1570368170315%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/6DE253F4-0041-4FFC-8CD8-86E5E7300541%40aol.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/6DE253F4-0041-4FFC-8CD8-86E5E7300541%40aol.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Azores Genealogy" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/1857773523.2776840.1570373959101%40mail.yahoo.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/1857773523.2776840.1570373959101%40mail.yahoo.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Azores Genealogy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to azores+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/azores/CAE_yQQVLp67gosA1eR%2BKnQdi31D43uiknDvt9y%2B5zRQ7tUqc%2BQ%40mail.gmail.com.
