You are right. It is, indeed, true that you may not "need" my
suggested equivalence of IWAH עוה and IBAH עבה, all you ("you"
in the general sense) need to do is to look up IWAH in an English-
Hebrew dictionary (say that of Gesenius) and see that IWAH is
'overturning', then apply your understanding of 'overturning' to the
Hebrew text. Human nature and experience is sufficiently universal so
that to every Hebrew word there corresponds (a peu pres, because
meaning is extensive) an English word, and vise versa.
I learned English only relatively late in life, and while reading the
Hebrew bible as a boy, and later as a young man, had nothing to fall
back upon but Hebrew itself. I knew no other language but Hebrew and
could hope to understand the biblical text only from within the
language itself (we did not have at home, nor at school, even a
Hebrew-Hebrew dictionary). My parents, like their parents and parents
of parents, were not native Hebrew speakers and studied the bible by
translation from their native tongues.
So what do I do now? I open the Hebrew dictionary of Eben Shoshan
("open" is only for the sake of this argument, otherwise I don't need
him) and see that IWAH is (the often metaphorical) IQEM עקם. So far
so good, but what is this IQEM? I don't look further because I know
that this lexical chasing of meaning will cause me to go in circles
and will be without end. By now I know that IQEM is, more or less,
what the English call 'bend, crook'. Internally, from within the
language, I understand that IQEM is 'caused to QUM, caused to rise in
a heaped shape'. But all this is but the IBAH עבה which I said (to
myself mostly) in the first place.
Conclusion: there is no intrinsic understanding of the Hebrew
language without these equivalents.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Feb 25, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Pere Porta wrote:
Unless you're able to clearly show how this is useful, this is,
Isaac, poorly helpful.
You have a tree: one trunk and several branches.
Saying that this branch and this other branch have the same basic
stem... helps us very little. Because branches are very different --
even quite different- from each other.
Please, if I'm not right show how and why I'm wrong.
Give some examples, please!
Pere Porta
2011/2/25 Isaac Fried <[email protected]>
It tells you what the basic meaning of עוה is.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
On Feb 25, 2011, at 11:25 AM, Pere Porta wrote:
The root עוה is a variant of the root עבה.
Isaac Fried, Boston University
__________________
Isaac,
From time to time I asked you about this kind of postings of yours:
What is this useful for?
Namely, saying or stating that "The root עוה is a variant of the
root עבה". ... what is it useful for? Which service does this
give us?
You never asked me about this.
(I'm not the only member in this list who puts this question...)
Give a reasonable answer, please, or stop sending such posting kind.
Regards
Pere Porta
(Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain)
Qohelet 1:15 מעות לא יוכל לתקן וחסרון לא
יוכל להמנות
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
--
Pere Porta
--
Pere Porta
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
