Dear Jim,

Your reply came back garbled. See below.

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: [email protected] 
  To: [email protected] ; [email protected] ; 
[email protected] 
  Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2011 3:40 AM
  Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] gen. 25 (tam?)


<font color='black' size='2' face='arial'>
<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>Rev. 
Bryant J. Williams III:</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><?xml:namespace prefix 
= o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" /><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>One of 
the main differences between the view of you and Karl, and my view, is that you 
(and I think Karl) see the Patriarchal narratives as having been composed in 
the Middle Bronze Age and relating to the Early Bronze Age, whereas I see the 
Patriarchal narratives as having been composed and relating to the Late Bronze 
Age.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>That is an honest 
disagreement.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>As I presume you are 
aware, most university scholars today insist that the Patriarchal narratives 
were composed by multiple authors in the 1<SUP>st</SUP> millennium BCE, none of 
whom knew very much about the Bronze Age.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>Let’s compare these three basic theories regarding two specific items 
that you raise.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>1.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>You wrote:<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>“Now, I can see Abram dwelling near a large amount of oaks 
because Northern California from about 50 miles South of Redding, CA on I-5 
going North has</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>plenty. 
Its weather is very much like Israel's with its Mediterranean climate. 
I</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>can 
actually picture Abram sitting under a very large Oak (cf. 14:13, 
24;18:1).”</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>The city 
of Hebron does not have a Mediterranean climate.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>It is nowhere near the Mediterranean Sea, but rather abuts 
the utterly bleak Judean Desert.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>In the 
Late Bronze Age [my theory], there were no oak trees at the city of 
Hebron.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The Late Bronze Age was 
abnormally dry, and oak trees do not usually grow as far south as the city of 
Hebron, because it’s too hot and there’s not enough rain.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>On the other hand, there was a lot more 
rain in the Early and Middle Bronze Ages, and so in that time period [your 
theory], one might imagine oak trees at the city of Hebron.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>On the scholarly view, multiple 
1<SUP>st</SUP> millennium BCE authors are making up a pre-history of the 
Hebrews.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>To them, the “days of 
old” would presumably have meant “dry years”, since the climate in the first 
half of the 1<SUP>st</SUP> millennium BCE was much wetter and better than in 
the Late Bronze Age.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>So to me it 
seems unlikely that 1<SUP>st</SUP> millennium BCE authors would imagine rare 
oak trees being at the city of Hebron in the Patriarchal Age.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>What 
works on all theories is if, per Genesis 13: 9, 11, Abraham goes west after Lot 
has gone east from Bethel.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Then 
Abraham sojourns in the northern Shephelah, the Aijalon Valley, which in 
Biblical times was ringed by magnificent oak trees, being perfectly in 
accordance with what the Biblical text says.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>2.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>You wrote:<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>“Genesis 23:17-20 has Abraham purchasing from Ephron the 
Hittite a piece of land called the Cave of Machpelah, east of Mamre near Hebron 
(formerly Kiriath-Arba, vs. 2; cf. also Josh 14:15; 15:13 and Judg 1:10) which 
had trees.”</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>(a)<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>There were no Hittites from eastern 
Anatolia in Canaan.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Rather, 
XTYmeans XuT-iYa, the most common Hurrian name at Nuzi.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The Biblical “Hittites” are the 
historical Hurrians, who dominated Canaan as princeling rulers in the 
mid-14<SUP>th</SUP> century BCE.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>This is indicating the Late Bronze Age, as no other time period fits the 
Hurrians being in Canaan as important lords.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>(b)<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The word “formerly” does not appear in 
the Biblical text.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Rather, HW) 
means “that is”, and does not mean “formerly”.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Kiriath is a standard west Semitic word for “city”.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>“Arba” means “four” in west Semitic, 
while meaning “(Hurrian) lord” in Hurrian.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>There is no “City of Four” in non-biblical records, and the 
number four makes no sense as a Biblical nickname here.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Rather, this is the “City of the 
Hurrian Lord(s)”.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>It’s a perfect 
Biblical nickname, because “Ephron” in Hurrian also means “(Hurrian) 
lord”.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The text is telling us that 
Abraham bought Sarah’s gravesite from a Hurrian lord at a Hurrian-dominated 
city in the Late Bronze Age.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The 
Hurrian nomenclature here strongly supports my Late Bronze Age dating, and 
cannot be squared with either your Middle Bronze Age composition date, or the 
scholarly view that multiple authors made this stuff up in the 1<SUP>st</SUP> 
millennium BCE.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>(c)<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Genesis 37: 14 tells us that the 
Patriarchs’ “Hebron”, that is, X-BR-W-N, is a “valley”.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>That’s the Aijalon Valley in the 
northern Shephelah, with valleys having no formal names in the Bronze Age.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Whereas Abraham sojourns in a verdant, 
low-lying rural valley [that makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?], Abraham has to 
deal with city folk to purchase Sarah’s gravesite.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: 
yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>In the Late Bronze Age, that meant going to a city dominated 
by Hurrian lords to buy a plot of land from a Hurrian lord.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>Kiriath Arba is on one level a nickname 
for RB-T, Rubutu, a Hurrian-dominated city on the southern edge of the Aijalon 
Valley.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>It is not the former name 
of the mountainous city of Hebron.<SPAN style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; 
</SPAN>In the Bronze Age, the name of the city of Hebron was 
“Qiltu”.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>3.<SPAN 
style="mso-spacerun: yes">&nbsp; </SPAN>The rest of your post does not deal 
with words that appear in the Hebrew text of the Patriarchal narratives, so I 
have no comment.</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><o:p><FONT 
size=3>&nbsp;</FONT></o:p></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>Jim 
Stinehart</FONT></div>


<div style="MARGIN: 0in 0in 10pt" class=HTMLPreformstted><FONT size=3>Evanston, 
Illinois</FONT></div>


<div style="FONT-FAMILY: arial,helvetica; COLOR: black; FONT-SIZE: 10pt">

<div style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #fff; MARGIN: 0px; FONT-FAMILY: Tahoma, Verdana, 
Arial, Sans-Serif; COLOR: #000; FONT-SIZE: 12px" 
id=AOLMsgPart_0_4a71f2b7-2980-4896-890c-d6c7c100c62f><PRE style="FONT-SIZE: 
9pt">&nbsp;</PRE></div>
<!-- end of AOLMsgPart_0_4a71f2b7-2980-4896-890c-d6c7c100c62f --></div>
</font>
<P><HR></P>Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.<BR>
Checked by AVG Free Edition.<BR>
Version: 7.5.446 / Virus Database: 268.18.3/696 - Release Date: 02/21/2007 3:19 
PM<BR>
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to