The reason hinges on the answer as to why there is no dagesh in the second B of BI-LBABO, 'in his heart', of Deut. 29:18 (yet there is a dagesh in the B of the preceding V-HI-T-BAREK), and also on the lack of a dagesh in the B of BI-KBODIY, 'in my glory' of Ex. 29:43 (yet there is a dagesh in the D of the preceding V-NI-QDA$), etc.?
Isaac Fried, Boston University On Apr 26, 2011, at 5:47 AM, Yigal Levin wrote: > Why? > > Yigal Levin > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Isaac Fried > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2011 8:36 AM > To: Isaac Fried > Cc: Hebrew Forum > Subject: [b-hebrew] What MASORAH did the MASORATES follow? > > In Genesis 32:11 we find KATON-TIY, in Gen 43:14 we find $AKOL-TIY, > in Deut. 9:19 we find YAGOR-TIY, and in Jer. 50:24 we find YAQO$-TIY, > all with a dagesh in the T of the attached pronoun -ATIY = -ANIY, > implying, in my opinion, that the xolam is not original. > > > Isaac Fried, Boston University > > _______________________________________________ > b-hebrew mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew > > _______________________________________________ > b-hebrew mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew _______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
