Karl, forget the Documentary Hypothesis. It has nothing to do with this.

I have no problem with Daniel 9 predicting AD 70 or AD 33 or AD 2012. It's just 
that I don't see the text doing this. It seems to be discussing the concept 
exile in light of the Antiochene Persecution. Again, that has nothing to do 
with the Documentary Hypothesis (which is about sources in the Pentateuch).

All our copies of Daniel reveal a uniformity about the content of Dan 9, as far 
as I can see.


GEORGE ATHAS
Dean of Research,
Moore Theological College (Sydney, Australia)


On 24/10/2012, at 9:29 AM, "K Randolph" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

George:

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 2:17 PM, George Athas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Daniel 9 was redacted after Jesus? Interesting suggestion, Nir. However, there 
are two major things against the suggestion.

First, it presumes that the 70 weeks are about Jesus. They aren't. Please see 
my blog post for further arguments:

Daniel 9:24 defines the period of time. It’s about “your people and your set 
apart city”.

(http://withmeagrepowers.wordpress.com/2012/10/19/the-seventy-weeks-of-daniel-9/)


Second, the manuscript evidence is against it. I recommend Collins' commentary 
on Daniel in the Hermeneia series for further details.

What about the manuscript evidence? That should have been brought up earlier, 
as that has import on this discussion (at least I think it should). My 
understanding that Daniel in its present form dates from at least 160 BC. 
Correct me if I’m wrong.

>From the Christian viewpoint, there’s no problem with Daniel accurately 
>telling about the destruction of Jerusalem in ca. 70 AD, as contrasted to the 
>pagan view connected with the Documentary Hypothesis. The same as referring to 
>“Messiah” as a reference to Jesus.


GEORGE ATHAS
Dean of Research,
Moore Theological College (moore.edu.au<http://moore.edu.au>)
Sydney, Australia



Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to