Kirk Lowery: 
You wrote:  “To my knowledge, the consonant [heth/X] never occurs in the 
semitic  languages as an inflectional morpheme. It is always part of a lexical 
stem or  root.” 
Thank you so much for confirming what my own research had  strongly 
suggested. 
One practical application of that key linguistic fact is  as follows. 
The mysterious name $RX [or %RX] at Genesis 46: 17 cannot  be analyzed as 
being $R or %R, plus suffix heth/X, if $RX is a Semitic  name.  Thus the 
well-documented  existence of the Semitic root $R is of no use if $RX is a west 
Semitic name [as  ordinarily thought], because no Semitic name could have a 
heth/X as a  suffix. 
That is why analysts change the first consonant of this  name to a 
samekh/S.  $RX [or %RX] is  then viewed as being a west Semitic name that is a 
bollixed-up version of SRX,  with the initial consonant samekh/S having  become 
confused with the initial consonant shin/$ or sin/%. 
But excluding Aramaic, samekh rarely is confused with sin  in Biblical 
Hebrew, despite the apparent similarity of their sounds.  Even more rarely is 
samekh confused with  shin in Biblical Hebrew [where the sounds are markedly 
different].  Thus although it is possible that the  name $RX or %RX at 
Genesis 46: 17 could be a bollixed-up version of SRX, to me  that does not seem 
very likely. 
My own view is that the spelling at Genesis 46: 17 has  pinpoint accuracy, 
that the name should be analyzed as being $R plus suffix  heth/X, and that 
accordingly $R-X is like $R-Y at Genesis 11: 29:  there is no known Semitic 
name for a  human being of this type.  The early  Hebrews knew many 
non-Semitic peoples, and tent-dwelling people just like the  early Hebrews are 
attested as sometimes recording their thoughts in writing [per  Amarna Letter 
EA 
273], so in my controversial opinion we should not be shocked  to find 
non-Semitic proper names, with proper Late Bronze Age spellings, in  Genesis.  
Moreover, we know that  $R-Y cannot possibly be a Canaanite name, because both 
Abraham and Isaac loathe  Canaanite brides.  Genesis 24:  3;  28: 1. Thus 
the conventional  view that $RY is an archaic form of a west Semitic name from 
an unattested  Canaanite dialect is simply not possible textually.  Plus, 
no such west Semitic name of a  human being has ever been found in the 
ancient world.  $R-X almost certainly cannot be a  Canaanite wife either, 
because 
per Genesis 46:10 we would expect to be told  if any wife in this list were 
a rare Canaanite wife.  Indeed, one suspects that $R-Y and $R-X  were 
brought into the Hebrew family in the identical manner, for the same  reason, 
with 
the presence of $R-X thus re-validating, as it were, the process by  which 
$R-Y became Abram’s wife/sister.  T-h-a-t  is why, you see,  $R-X as a woman 
is listed and counted as one of the 70 Hebrews who migrate to  Egypt from 
Canaan with Jacob.  The scholarly view is that $R-Y and $R-X must somehow be 
thought of as  being unattested west Semitic names;  but not only does that 
scholarly view appear to be linguistically  impossible [if one doesn’t 
change the letters in the received text], but also  then there is no 
explanation 
either as to (i) why $R-Y’s biological parentage is  not mentioned at the 
end of chapter 11 of Genesis, or (ii) why $R-X is counted  as one of the 70 
Hebrews who move to Egypt.  In my view, it is not a mere  “coincidence” that 
Sarah, whose birth name is $R-Y, is said to be Abraham’s  “sister” at 
Genesis 20: 12, and $R-X is likewise said to be Beriah’s “sister” at  Genesis 
46: 17. 
If the very first female name in the Patriarchal  narratives, and one of 
the last female names, are both non-Semitic, and both of  these non-Semitic 
women are expressly said to be a man’s “sister”, that would be  telling us 
something important about the antiquity and historicity and basic  meaning of 
the Patriarchal narratives.  Wouldn’t it be wonderful if an historical 
linguist were someday to  a-s-k  if $R-Y and $R-X are non-Semitic names  coming 
straight out of the Late Bronze Age? 
Jim Stinehart 
Evanston,  Illinois
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to