Chavoux Luyt:

You wrote:  “Thatoption [that the place where Moses saw the burning bush and 
where he is to “serveGod” is not in or near the Sinai or Arabia] is simply not 
possible becauseExodus 3:12 makes it explicit that the Israelites will serve 
God on that verymountain where He first appeared to Moses.  Whether that 
mountain is actually the placecalled Mt.Sinai today, is another question that 
should probably be asked in anarchaeological group rather than b-hebrew.”

The key issue here is not archaeology, but rather is themeaning of the Hebrew 
common word (BD, in the expression “serve God” or “serveMe”.  That’s a classic 
question for theb-hebrew list to discuss.

In fact, the Exodus 3: 12concept of “serving God” on “this mountain” requires a 
locale where the Hebrewsare divinely fated to live, not a desolate locale far 
south of where theIsraelites settle.  An express referenceto “serv[ing] God”, 
where “serve” is some form of the Hebrew verb (BD, appearson 15 occasions in 
Exodus.  On all butthe first and third occasions, the phrase certainly embodies 
the concept ofserving YHWH for a long time, even forever, rather than 
signifying an act ofshort duration.  Exodus 4: 23; 8: 1, 20;9: 1, 13; 10: 3, 
7-8, 11, 26(2); 12: 31; 23: 25.  Under ordinary circumstances, that would 
seemto be the only natural reading of this phrase “serve God” [or “serve Me”] 
thatis used so many times in Exodus.  However,the third such reference, at 
Exodus 7: 16, is ambiguous in this regard, becausealthough YHWH is intending 
that the Israelites should serve Him forever, hethere refers to the Israelites 
serving God in the wilderness [midbar], which atleast in some sense would imply 
only a limited period of time [while theIsraelites were in the wilderness 
during the Exodus].

The key question then isthis:  what concept is implied in thefirst such 
reference to the phrase “serv[ing] God”, at Exodus 3: 12?  Certainly the 
meaning that applies at least 13out of the other 14 times such phrase occurs in 
Exodus should be favored.  When Moses is fairly near [but not in] MDYN,and YHWH 
tells Moses “ye shall serve God upon this mountain”, the phrase “serveGod upon 
this mountain” should be given its natural meaning of serving Godforever at 
that locale.  Accordingly, themountain in question needs to be located within 
the land that the Israelitesare divinely fated to inhabit [and hence nowhere 
near the Sinai or Arabia,contra the traditional and scholarly view of the 
geography here].  So once the Israelites have taken all of theland which they 
have been divinely granted, they will be able to continually“serve God” forever 
in this location [upon “this mountain”].  That is my interpretation.  It 
strains the Hebrew word (BD to take theradically different interpretation that 
“serv[ing] God upon this mountain”merely implies that the Israelites are to 
listen to God’s word at Mt. Sinai[with Mt. Sinai being “this mountain” on that 
interpretation], when they are inthe wilderness during the Exodus.  Afterthe 
Exodus from Egypt has been completed, the Israelites will have no 
furtheroccasion to go south to the southern Sinai to serve God at that 
desolatelocation, which is situated very far south of the land that the 
Israelites aredivinely fated to inhabit as their own land.  Of course, the 
Israelites must always keep the10 Commandments that Moses receives at Mt. 
Sinai, that’s for sure.  But the Israelites will not be at Mt. Sinai to“serve 
God” after the Exodus has been completed, as the more natural reading ofExodus 
3: 12 requires.

The interpretation of“serv[ing] God” at Exodus 3: 12 which requires serving God 
on an ongoing,permanent basis is the only natural reading of this phrase, as 
backed up by atleast 13 of the other 14 uses of this same phrase in Exodus.  On 
that natural reading, the “desert”/XRBmountain where Moses encounters the 
burning bush must be located within theboundaries of the land that the 
Israelites are divinely fated to possess andinhabit, so that “upon this 
mountain” the Israelites will be able to serve YHWHforever.  And  t-h-a-t  is 
why Moses insists on attacking King Og at Numbers 21: 33 and taking his land of 
Bashan in the northern Transjordan, even though Bashan was not on the route of 
the Conquest and was not part of the Promised Land of Canaan [west of the 
Jordan River]:  so that "this mountain", the "desert"/XRB mountain where Moses 
sees the burning bush at Exodus 3: 2-4, will be part of the land where the 
Israelites settle.  The XRB/"desert" mountain site of the burning bush is 
located just south of Zipporah's homeland of MDYN [historical Mitanni in 
eastern Syria],being just north of the eastern Transjordan, at the far 
northeast corner of where the Israelites settled and "serve[d] God" forever.

Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois

_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to