Nir / Karl etc:

I quickly checked (while my 14 month old was screaming for me to pick her up) 
my simple dictionaries for Akkadian, Syriac, Sabaic and Amharic.

Only Amharic had moth under the same heading as fire ?S(sibilant)(I don't 
remember if it was S or Sh).
Clearly I am no expert -  but my understanding is that Amharic has lost its 
distinction between aleph, ayin, heh, and chaet.
Hence it was with its equivalent of AeSh = fire.


My understanding for the base meaning for \S - \Sh is "to perform / persist at 
something"
Caterpillar's seem to be insatiable consumers, perhaps it has something to do 
with that?

David Kolinsky,
Monterey, CA




________________________________
 From: Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. <[email protected]>
To: K Randolph <[email protected]> 
Cc: B-Hebrew <[email protected]> 
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 2:03 PM
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] ($ (job 4:19)
 


karl, 

really, looking a bit closer into the problem, i discovered that moth is 
indeed considered 
the 
main destroyer of cloths. the difficulty in assessing the termites in this 
respect is 
that 
today's clothes and houses are different than the BH 
standard. 

in general, termites eat cellulose: lumber, doors, furniture, cardboard, 
paper, wallpaper 
etc. 
but as garments used to be made from cotton and linen mostly, i imagine 
that they would  
destroy them too. to do this, they build thin tunnels along the house 
walls, 
until they find 
cellulose. 

http://laundry.about.com/od/laundrybasics/ss/Insects-That-Destroy-Clothes-Insect-Clothes-Pests_8.htm
 

what they excel at is the other property you mentioned: building 
houses. 

nir 
cohen 

ps is ($ used in other semitic 
languages? 


On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:49:08 -0700, K Randolph 
wrote 
> 
Nir: 
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. <[email protected]> 
> wrote: 
> 
karl, 
>> 
>> 

>>>This is an animal that eats clothing Isaiah 50:9, and builds houses 

Job 
>> 

27:18. This description fits a caterpillar that becomes a 
moth. 
>> 
>> 

how about 
termites? 
>> 
>> 

nir 
cohen 
>> 
>> 
> I’ll have to admit that I 

never considered 
termites. 
> 
> 1) because the dictionaries I worked 

from all mentioned “moth” and caterpillars are immature moths (even in 

English we talk about “moth eaten” when in reality it’s the caterpillars, 

not the adult moths, that do the 

damage). 
> 
> 2) Do termites have a reputation for eating cloth? I haven’t 

heard of 
it. 
> 
> Karl W. 
Randolph. 


-- 
Open WebMail Project (http://openwebmail.org/) 

 
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew

Reply via email to