George: On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:48 PM, George Athas <[email protected]>wrote:
> It would be more honest of you, Karl, if you acknowledged in the first > place that what you said was your own view … > It is not my own view. I didn’t make it up, rather it is one that I first heard from others. When looking at all the evidence, I find it more plausible than the Manetho derived histories espoused by the majority of major university historians. > … and not the view of the fallible majority, rather than making a sweeping > statement that makes your own view sound like the accepted consensus. > Frankly, I don’t know where you get the idea that I claim that it’s the accepted consensus. I thought I was very clear that it isn’t. > Surely that would be more informative to us plebs who like to consider the > consensus, and also more faithful to your own principled disdain for the > consensus. > It’s not disdain I have for the consensus, rather I looked at it, and found it failing. I looked at the alternative to the consensus, and while it’s not perfect, it seems to fit the facts from archeology and history far better than the consensus. > > > *GEORGE ATHAS* > *Dean of Research,* > *Moore Theological College *(moore.edu.au) > *Sydney, Australia* > > Karl W. Randolph.
_______________________________________________ b-hebrew mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
