On 06/01/2020 07:05 PM, Steve Newcomb wrote:
On 5/28/20 8:13 PM, smartwi...@gmail.com wrote:
Steve, I am also using ap with a QCA9558 SOC and Also using
ath10k-firmware-qca988x . I have also considered using adhoc.
I think I discovered something yesterday that explains everything, and it's
very reproducible. The mesh mode in the QCA firmware works reliably in the lab
and in the field, but only when there are 3 or fewer nodes. If I add one more
node, the mesh will completely fail, either immediately or within a few hours.
If the nodes are strung out in a daisy chain, failure is usually, but not
always, delayed for a while, and the links break in a piecemeal fashion, one at
a time. If the nodes are close enough to each other, total failure occurs
quite quickly. I surmise that the 802.11s implementation in the QCA driver was
not tested with more than 3 nodes, or perhaps it wasn't designed to support
more than 3 nodes. Sigh.
Sven, I think this epiphany obviates the need for your test (which I still
haven't figured out how to execute in the field), but I'll return to that
effort if you think I should.
So in the end, unless I replace the hardware throughout the neighborhood with
far more expensive hardware, I must find a way to use Ben's driver, or to have
no mesh network with more than 3 nodes in it.
Have you tried using IPQ4019 based systems? They seem pretty affordable, and the
3-radio Linksys MR8300 & EA8300 seem pretty stable
in my testing recently (in AP mode, not tested mesh).
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <gree...@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
