On 2012-07-14 12:10 PM, Arend van Spriel wrote: > On 07/13/2012 08:52 PM, Thomas Huehn wrote: >> The pointer control.sta is removed from ieee80211_tx_info to free up >> sufficient >> memory in SKB_CB on the tx-path to enable new annotations per data packet >> e.g. >> support of upcoming Transmit Power Control (TPC). >> Now the control.sta pointer is put on the stack where it is passed as >> function >> parameter to the .tx equivalent (ieee80211_ops) of each affected wireless >> driver. Therefore a new structure ieee80211_tx_control is added to mac80211.h >> which holds the sta structure instead. >> >> --- >> .../net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c | 6 +++-- >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c >> b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c >> index 9e79d47..a7be68d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/mac80211_if.c >> @@ -264,7 +264,9 @@ static void brcms_set_basic_rate(struct brcm_rateset >> *rs, u16 rate, bool is_br) >> } >> } >> >> -static void brcms_ops_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, struct sk_buff *skb) >> +static void brcms_ops_tx(struct ieee80211_hw *hw, >> + struct ieee80211_tx_control *control, >> + struct sk_buff *skb) > > Fix indent here (if it is not a mailer issue). Indentation looks correct to me. The + in front of the 'static' moves the rest of the line one character further to the right, whereas in the other lines it's compensated by the tabstop.
- Felix _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
