On 10 May 2014 17:17, Michael Büsch <m...@bues.ch> wrote: > On Sat, 10 May 2014 16:44:48 +0200 > Rafał Miłecki <zaj...@gmail.com> wrote: >> +config B43_BUSES_BCMA_AND_SSB >> + bool "BCMA and SSB" >> + depends on BCMA_POSSIBLE && SSB_POSSIBLE > > I think this needs to be: > > depends on (BCMA_POSSIBLE && (BCMA = y || BCMA = B43)) && > (SSB_POSSIBLE && (SSB = y || SSB = B43)) > > to avoid the case where b43 is y and ssb or bcma is m. > Or did I miss something and this is caught elsewhere?
Oh, wait, I think I meant B43_BUSES_BCMA_AND_SSB to select BCMA and SSB (so user doesn't have to enable BCMA and SSB on his own). It it the way it's handled without my patch (B43 select-s SSB). I'd like to add select BCMA select SSB , but this won't guarantee BCMA (or SSB) being "y" after choosing B43 to "y". Or will it? Any idea how to handle that? _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
