On 30 June 2014 12:54, Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com> wrote: > On 29-06-14 21:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >> LCNXN is simply a continuation of N, e.g. code handling LCNXN revs 0 and >> 1 is mostly the same as for N-PHY revs 7+. > > Hi Rafał, > > LCNXN is actually a LCN phy with 2 streams (mimo).
Err, I don't think so. Could you take a closer look at this? I'm pretty sure LCNXN is continuation of N. Maybe you were thinking about LCN40? I don't know much about LCN40, maybe it's a variation of LCN? _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
