On 30-06-14 13:04, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 30 June 2014 12:54, Arend van Spriel <ar...@broadcom.com> wrote: >> On 29-06-14 21:46, Rafał Miłecki wrote: >>> LCNXN is simply a continuation of N, e.g. code handling LCNXN revs 0 and >>> 1 is mostly the same as for N-PHY revs 7+. >> >> Hi Rafał, >> >> LCNXN is actually a LCN phy with 2 streams (mimo). > > Err, I don't think so. Could you take a closer look at this? I'm > pretty sure LCNXN is continuation of N.
You got me. I taken a closer look. It seems to stand for e'x'tended n. There was separate phy code for it, but in recent code it seems to be handled by n phy code. So you are right. > Maybe you were thinking about LCN40? I don't know much about LCN40, > maybe it's a variation of LCN? Probably. Gr. AvS _______________________________________________ b43-dev mailing list b43-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/b43-dev
