StarBrilliant <[email protected]> writes: > Hi everyone, > > I have been looking into this problem for months. > > I found that Linux kernel have difficulty determining source address > for an icmp-ttl-exceeded packet if SADR is used. > > Sometimes it will return the primary address as if SADR route does not > exist; sometimes it will just seallow the reply packet, showing as a > "???" in the traceroute. > > In some rare random situation a machine with two routes like "default > from 2001.../48" would report "no route to host" when you want to > connect from it to some random (not all) hosts in the Internet, > although the machine routes packets from others correctly. > > I found that icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr does not work for IPv6, > and have been trying to port that option to IPv6. I am not sure if it > can fix the traceroute problem. But I am currently suspending this > work, hopefully someone else is interested in it. > > I agree that we need such an option. That's simply because Linux > kernel is buggy.
Yeah, this seems buggy. Have you reported the issue on netdev? :) -Toke _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
