No, I haven't. On Sat, Jul 7, 2018 at 06:23 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <[email protected]> wrote:
> StarBrilliant <[email protected]> writes: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have been looking into this problem for months. > > > > I found that Linux kernel have difficulty determining source address > > for an icmp-ttl-exceeded packet if SADR is used. > > > > Sometimes it will return the primary address as if SADR route does not > > exist; sometimes it will just seallow the reply packet, showing as a > > "???" in the traceroute. > > > > In some rare random situation a machine with two routes like "default > > from 2001.../48" would report "no route to host" when you want to > > connect from it to some random (not all) hosts in the Internet, > > although the machine routes packets from others correctly. > > > > I found that icmp_errors_use_inbound_ifaddr does not work for IPv6, > > and have been trying to port that option to IPv6. I am not sure if it > > can fix the traceroute problem. But I am currently suspending this > > work, hopefully someone else is interested in it. > > > > I agree that we need such an option. That's simply because Linux > > kernel is buggy. > > Yeah, this seems buggy. Have you reported the issue on netdev? :) > > -Toke >
_______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
