> One of my environments uses BGP full-table from 3 upstream ISPs (each > with 785k routes currently).
Well, that's a lot. BGP is designed with that in mind -- it uses incremental updates layered over a reliable protocol, and therefore scales beautifully in a stable network. Babel uses unreliable updates, on the assumption that it is used in an unstable network. I don't think that Babel is the right tool for dealing with such large numbers of routes. > And here are the things Babel currently lacks: > - Capability of handling 785k × 3 routes > - An extension to preserve AS Path It really looks like you want BGP. Why don't we work together on adding SADR to BGP? -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
