Hi everyone, Thank you for your replies.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 6:49 PM Juliusz Chroboczek <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, that's a lot. BGP is designed with that in mind -- it uses > incremental updates layered over a reliable protocol, and therefore scales > beautifully in a stable network. Babel uses unreliable updates, on the > assumption that it is used in an unstable network. Yes. I agree. > I don't think that Babel is the right tool for dealing with such large > numbers of routes. Agree. > > And here are the things Babel currently lacks: > > - Capability of handling 785k в 3 routes > > - An extension to preserve AS Path > > It really looks like you want BGP. Why don't we work together on adding > SADR to BGP? Actually I want three features that Babel has and BGP doesn't: 1) RTT based routing decision 2) Packet loss based routing decision 3) SADR I fully support your suggestion to add features to BGP. But I am afraid it is too hard to add RTT based routing decision. How do you think about it? Best regards, StarBrilliant _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
