> I think I agree with Juliusz here, I'd prefer Babel stay truthful and > instead change how fq_codel reacts to it.
Yeah, perhaps fq_codel is not tolerant enough of bursts of packets. But I think we should work around that on the application side -- babeld shouldn't be sending updates as a burst in the first place, it should be pacing the updates so that fq_codel doesn't shoot them down. I've got a plan, but no time to work on it. (I've got some funding, though, so if anyone is interested in a poorly paid job in French Academia, please get in touch.) -- Juliusz _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
