[Followups restricted]

>> For example, you speak about developing visualisation software, it'd
>> be great if it were cleanly split into a visualision core, and
>> a module to interface to olsrd.

> I believe the dot(1) format is usually sufficient as an abstract layer
> to describe the networks (for visualization purposes).

Mind you, Babel doesn't have full topology information, just
reachability data.  So being fully protocol-agnostic implies being able
to reconstruct the missing data.

(A more minor objection is that dot imlies that you're sending periodic
full dumps to your visualisation software rather than deltas.)

                                        Juliusz

_______________________________________________
Babel-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users

Reply via email to