On Jun 12, 2010, at 11:23 AM, Mitar wrote: > Hi! > > (Please reply to our talk mailing list and not news as the later is > just for announcements. I have forwarded your previous replies there > but please check any further followups to go there.)
ok. > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 1:29 PM, L. Aaron Kaplan <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Jun 12, 2010, at 6:24 AM, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: >> I believe the dot(1) format is usually sufficient as an abstract layer to >> describe >> the networks (for visualization purposes). > > Not really as we do not have graphviz available on all platforms. > >> and of course you can visualize it via Java on the phone itself > > You can? You know of a decent visualization library in Java for a dot > format? Then this could really be a good intermediate format. But I Can we run Java applets on the phone? If yes, I think I can add some very simple java based (built on processing) topology visualization. > thought we would just use some lib and feed it with whatever (do not > know which one for Java, though). This is really not protocol specific > - once you have a topology graph at hand it does not really matter if > you use dot or not. > yes, I simply suggested the dot format since it is so easy and is already understood by many programs. Yes, sure - a graph with edge labels is a graph - no matter which protocol you run ;-)) a. _______________________________________________ Babel-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/babel-users
