On 06/02/07, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 06/02/07, Andrew Bowden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And yet it's still used...
> > Doesn't that say something?
> It says that record execs are stupid, but we all knew that already.
I was going more for a "it might be broken by some, but it's good enough
for 'purpose'".
And what is that purpose, exactely?
--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
