Seconded. It would be interesting to get a comment on what went wrong, though - and an indication if there's a better way of reporting problems specific to the xmltv feed - I got the feeling that the generic address probably doesn't reach the right people. Of course I could be wrong, maybe my mail there was the only one they got and they immediately jumped up and mended things.....
Peter On 10/04/07, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The feeds appear to be back up and being updated, so thanks to all who may have helped! Cheers, Rich. On 4/10/07, Kim Plowright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've let the head of New Media at BBC Worldwide Magazines know about > this, by the way. > > Kim > > > > > > However, as people probably realise the data isn't being > > updated anymore. > > > > > > > > Does anyone have a clue? > > > Just had a boilerplate response from them - seems unlikely my > > email reached a human, let alone one who knows what xmltv > > means. I wonder how I make my xmltv grabber clear its 'RT > > cache/profile'? Come to think of it, I wonder if Joe Webuser > > who complained to RT would make head or tail of that directive? > > - > Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
-- Peter Bowyer Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
