On 15/06/07, Richard Lockwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Your name and logo's would still be covered by "Trademark" and similar
> protections. Misrepresenting the source of a good is surely illegal
> isn't it?
Oh - so visual intellectual property is fine, but recorded isn't?
Trademark law is totally different to copyright law and totally
different again to patent law. Please don't confuse them under the
bogus umbrella term 'intellectual property' - its phrased
intentionally to misdirect and confuse the way we consider these
issues.
--
Regards,
Dave
-
Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please
visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html.
Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
