On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 04:20:56PM +0000, Brian Butterworth wrote: > Which is just another way of saying "standards are not standards if they are > ignored".
I would disagree with this, a standard that is ignored is still a standard, it's just an ignored one. The word "standard" doesn't mean something that's commonly used it means something that is on a standards track specification. -- Noah Slater <http://bytesexual.org/> "Creativity can be a social contribution, but only in so far as society is free to use the results." - R. Stallman - Sent via the backstage.bbc.co.uk discussion group. To unsubscribe, please visit http://backstage.bbc.co.uk/archives/2005/01/mailing_list.html. Unofficial list archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
